§2 platform:
- Accuracy promoted from \paragraph to \subsection (sec:accuracy);
it sits at the same heading level as Why / Device / Latency / HW
config and so reads as a first-class component of the platform
description rather than a tail-end footnote.
- Three architecture diagrams (SIP, CUBE, PE) collapsed into one
figure* using subcaption: Fig.~\ref{fig:hw-arch}(a) SIP and (b)
CUBE side-by-side on row 1, (c) PE wide on row 2, total height
capped at ~40% of the page. Subfigure cross-references rewritten
to Fig.~ref{fig:hw-arch}\subref{...} in the body text. main.tex
now pulls in the subcaption package.
- Table 1 (modeled hardware configuration) promoted to table*
(two-column / full page width) and the row layout rewritten as a
4-column tabular so Hierarchy + PE + Command-issue sit on the
left and Memory + Interconnect sit on the right. The previous
single-column rendering was getting cut at the right edge of the
printed column.
§6 GQA:
- Removed the historical four-panel headline table (tab:gqa), the
two figures (fig:gqa-lat, fig:gqa-break), and the prose paragraph
that cited their per-panel numbers. Reason: the underlying
milestone-gqa-headline bench has been simplified in collaborator
commit 65c365f ("drop misleading single_user_/multi_user_
panels") and no longer reproduces that data, so the section was
left referencing a dataset the current bench cannot regenerate.
- The previously-added 4-cases long-context decode comparison is
now §6's only Results subsection, retitled to
"Results: long-context decode and parallelism strategies".
The headline GQA result that survives into the paper is therefore
the parallelism trade-off study (Case 4 / Cube-SP × PE-SP at 34 us
buying an 8x KV-memory reduction over the latency leaders).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Reordered §2 subsections to follow the SIP → CUBE → PE → graph
flow: Why KernBench → Device and execution model → Latency model
→ Modeled hardware configuration. Readers now meet the device
hierarchy before the graph abstraction that re-uses it.
- §2.2 Device and execution model: starts with the SIP/CUBE/PE
hierarchy paragraphs (each anchoring fig:sip-arch, fig:cube-arch,
fig:pe-arch); then the runtime-API/sim-engine/components bullet
list; then the atomic-vs-composite command distinction (corrects
the prior over-narrow framing that read every PE command as
composite -- atomic single-engine commands exist too, and PE_CPU
itself runs control-plane work directly).
- §2.3 Latency model: opens with the four-contribution decomposition
(per-node overhead, per-edge transmission, drain, queuing delay)
and the latency_model schematic; retains existing The hardware as
a graph / From graph to DES / Latency contributions / Congestion
/ Control-plane cost model / Accuracy paragraphs. Accuracy
paragraph now closes on KernBench's sufficiency for *relative*
HW/SW design trade-offs given analytic + external-simulator
agreement.
- New figures and assets:
- figures/sip_architecture.pdf (SIP-level graph view)
- figures/cube_architecture.pdf (CUBE-level zoom-in)
- figures/latency_model.png (conceptual latency-model
schematic with per-node /
per-edge / drain / queuing-delay
colour coding)
- figures/pe_architecture.png (carried over)
- Source-of-truth generator for the latency schematic:
scripts/paper/paper_latency_model_diagram.py (a report-only
harness under scripts/paper/ per the /paper isolation rule).
- main.tex preamble: \usepackage{tikz} added (kept from prior
sequence-diagram draft -- harmless now that the latency model is
a PNG; left in to keep paragraph numbering stable).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- §1 Introduction rewritten with AHBM-first opening, in-paper KernBench
platform overview, GQA motivation and three architectural requirements,
three matching HW-SW co-design mechanisms (GQA-aware placement,
PE_IPCQ, composite-command GEMM under PE_SCHEDULER), broader-
applicability outlook (PE_IPCQ as collective substrate, composite
command for fused operator pipelines), and outline. Consistent with
the Executive Summary structure.
- Executive Summary: extended broader-applicability closing with a
forward-looking line previewing FFN/MoE integration.
- §5 section heading renamed from
"All-Reduce Acceleration via PE_IPCQ" to
"PE_IPCQ and Collective Communication".
- Title page date line refined to "2026 H1 Report".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
New `/paper` slash-command skill that synthesizes ADR/SPEC content and live
KernBench benchmark results into a sectioned LaTeX technical paper compiled
to PDF with Tectonic (auto-installed). The skill negotiates a TOC, grounds
every number in committed artifacts or fresh bench runs, and keeps
report-only benches isolated.
This commit also includes the first generated report:
- docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/ — main.tex + per-section .tex, figures,
toc.md contract, and the built 8-page main.pdf. Covers the platform
(source-level kernels, latency model + accuracy, HW config from
topology.yaml), GEMM via composite command, All-Reduce via PE_IPCQ, and
fused GQA combining both, plus discussion/conclusion/2H future work.
- scripts/paper/ — isolated report harnesses (not registered benches):
paper_gqa_latency.py harvests per-panel GQA end-to-end latency + engine
occupancy (the milestone only emitted op-counts); paper_plot_gqa.py
renders the GQA figures.
GEMM/All-Reduce reuse committed milestone figures/CSVs; GQA results are
generated fresh. Honest flags retained: PE_CPU dispatch cost is 0 in this
config, and the proposed two-composite softmax_merge decode is marked
designed-not-measured.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
ywkang