Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ywkang a4a2683aad paper(gqa): single-rank decode-streaming study — composite's masked bandwidth win
Adds the memory-bound mirror of the compute-bound prefill figure. New single-rank decode sweep (T_q=1, M=8) reuses the prefill_compute_bound kernels, sweeping per-rank S_kv with NO cross-CUBE reduce — isolating the local attention that the 64-way Case-6 decode masks under its reduce tail.

Finding: even memory-bound decode benefits from the composite command. Its scheduler-streamed concurrent per-tile DMAs reach ~233 GB/s (91% of the 256 GB/s per-rank roofline) while the primitive's blocking tl.dot serializes one tile DMA and plateaus at ~166 GB/s — a 25-28% latency win that widens with context. This refines the paper's 'decode is latency-neutral' claim: neutral at 64-way production scale (reduce-dominated), but the composite extracts bandwidth at the local level. The bandwidth roofline here mirrors the MAC roofline in prefill.

Adds: gqa_decode_streaming.py sweep (wired into the milestone umbrella as GQA_1H_SWEEPS=decode_streaming), paper_plot_gqa_decode_streaming.py, the figure, and a new fig:gqa-decode-stream + paragraph in 05-gqa.tex; rebuilt main.pdf. Prefill (Experiment B) re-verified byte-identical (794.1/668.1/646.9us).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 19:39:45 -07:00
ywkang faf011dae5 paper(ipcq): regen alternatives figures + comparison plot + allreduce section
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 19:19:55 -07:00
ywkang 24c705419e paper(gqa): two-regime "use of composite commands" — decode + compute-bound prefill
Complete the composite-command study across both attention regimes and
write up the result, resolving when the composite command helps latency.

Decode (memory-bound, T_q=1, M=8): the command form is latency-neutral —
the kernel is bound by KV streaming and the MAC array is near-idle, so the
composite's only benefit here is host-issue offload (O(n_tiles) -> O(1)
PE_CPU commands). Figure: gqa_decode_long_ctx_composite (latency flat,
command count saturates).

Prefill (compute-bound, large M=G*T_q tile-filling): add three command-form
variants of a single-rank FlashAttention prefill kernel
(_gqa_prefill_compute_bound: primitive / composite / composite_extended).
Here the composite's scheduler-internal per-tile DMA<->compute pipeline
keeps the MAC array fed while the primitive's blocking tl.dot starves it,
so composite wins on MAC utilization (68% flat -> 83%) and wall-clock
(19% faster at ctx=1024), with the margin growing with context (deeper
P.V reduction = more tiles to pipeline) — the compute-bound mirror of the
GEMM result in section 3. Figure: gqa_prefill_compute_bound (latency +
MAC util). Sweep wired as GQA_1H_SWEEPS=prefill_cb; tests cover structure,
e2e, and composite<primitive in the compute-bound regime.

The synthesis: composite has two benefits set by roofline position —
host-issue offload (always) and MAC-array feeding (compute-bound only).
Decode exercises the first, prefill both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 17:04:26 -07:00
ywkang cd6f0ed91d feat(gqa): Case-6 composite-command decode variants + on-chip-operand DMA fix
Add two command-form variants of the Case-6 (Cube-SP x PE-SP) long-context
decode kernel alongside the primitive baseline:
  - composite: per-tile GEMMs issued as one coarse tl.composite over the
    full S_local (PE_SCHEDULER tiles/streams K,V) -- O(1) PE_CPU commands
    vs the primitive kernel's O(n_tiles).
  - composite_extended: Q.K^T composite + softmax_merge recipe composite
    (ADR-0065), folding the per-tile online merge + P.V.

Extract the shared two-level (m,l,O) reduce into _gqa_mlo_reduce and
refactor the baseline to use it (byte-equal, guarded by a 64-rank
command-stream digest test).

Engine fix: _make_compute_out omitted pinned=True, so an on-chip TCM
compute result consumed as a composite GEMM operand was scheduled as an
HBM DMA_READ of its bit-61 scratch address -> PhysAddrError in data mode.
Mark compute outputs pinned (resident), matching the composite
auto-output and recipe scratch handles. .pinned is read only by the
tiling DMA gate, so this is byte-equal for existing benches.

Add the composite sweep (emit-level PE_CPU dispatch to 1M + data-mode
latency to 128K), its plot, umbrella wiring (GQA_1H_SWEEPS=composite),
and tests (refactor guard, dispatch saturation, engine-fix, e2e).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 16:07:41 -07:00
mukesh bb668a3ac3 paper(gqa): derive (m,l,O) AR per-PE cost from kernel topology
Replaces the unsourced 32 KB/layer placeholder in the analytical chart
with T*(N-1)/N where T = h_q * S_q * (d_head*2 + 8) ~ 2.1 KB
(per-PE (m, l, O) payload) and N is the participant count of the
reduce-only chain per stage. Cases 2/3/6 analytical bars now match
the simulator-measured numbers within ~10% (was 6-30x over).

Also:
- Bumps the measurement S_kv from 8 K to 64 K to verify Cases 1, 2, 3, 6
  are genuinely S_kv-independent and Cases 4, 5 scale linearly.
- In-bar descriptor on the paired chart is now wrapped to fit the bar
  width, black, no background box, and centered between the analytical
  and measured bars so the label applies to both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 15:38:20 -07:00
mukesh 0662c76fa7 paper(ipcq): de-emphasize flow-diagram outer frame so inner flow stands out
Drops the per-case panel outline from linewidth 2.2 to 0.9 with 85% alpha.
The case-color frame still anchors each panel but no longer competes
with the swimlanes, flit packets, and annotations inside.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 15:01:09 -07:00
mukesh 37dc48fd27 paper(ipcq): add latency-model-style flow + stacked architecture diagrams
Adds two new IPCQ architecture views in the latency_model.png aesthetic:
a 2x2 flow figure (one per case) and a 4x1 stacked figure for taller
horizontal panels. Refactors per-case panel drawing into shared helpers
and disambiguates the flit labels (HMQ desc -> Hd so it does not
collide with data D). Two-row legend keys.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 14:55:59 -07:00
mukesh 73e0b315fe paper(gqa): table cleanup — drop measured-comm column, narrower fig, wrapped title
Removes the (measured) comm column, widens the Notes column with
shorter wrapped text, scales the table figure down, and wraps the
heading to two lines so it sits flush with the table.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 14:02:42 -07:00
mukesh 1552028c25 paper(ipcq): add IPCQ vs HW alternatives comparative study
6 generated figures comparing IPCQ (chosen) against the 3 HW alternatives
(Doorbell+Polling, HMQ, RDMA-CQ): architecture blocks, latency stack,
op counts, sequence flow, decision matrix, and control/data plane overlay.

Three figures also copied into the paper's figures/ folder for inclusion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 13:27:23 -07:00
mukesh 8102ddbe30 paper(gqa): rename long-ctx artifacts to gqa_long_ctx_6cases_* and add 4 decode 6-case charts
Filename cleanup so every long-ctx GQA artifact has a consistent
"gqa_long_ctx_6cases_*" prefix (or "gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_*"
for decode-only charts). Old "4cases" / mixed names retired.

Renames (long_ctx + figures, content unchanged):
  gqa_hbm_budget.png                  -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_hbm_budget.png
  gqa_4cases_summary.png              -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_summary.png
  gqa_4cases_memory_comm_analytical   -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_memory_comm_analytical.png
  gqa_4cases_memory_comm_paired       -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_memory_comm_paired.png
  gqa_kv_sharding_6cases_diagram      -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_kv_sharding_diagram.png
  gqa_kv_sharding_6cases_table        -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_kv_sharding_table.png
  gqa_3cases_measured_comm.json       -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_measured_comm.json
  gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases_*.png    -> gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_*.png
                                         (figures dir; long_ctx never had old)

New 4-chart 6-case set in long_ctx output dir (regenerated by
paper_plot_gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases.py, which now reads all 6
sweep_decode.json panels — Cases 1-6 with the same colour scheme
used elsewhere: red = overflow per-PE HBM, grey = neutral, blue
= Pareto-best ★):

  gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_latency.png
  gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_memory.png
  gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_parallelism.png
  gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_traffic.png

Generator scripts updated to write the new filenames + handle the
two new d_head-TP variants (Cases 4, 5) in their per-PE memory and
active-PE-count helpers. Figure widths bumped 10 -> 12 in to fit 6
multi-line case labels.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 11:49:03 -07:00
mukesh 84bb418e1e gqa(decode): add d_head-TP kernels + measurement runner + figure generators
Two new long-ctx decode attention kernels for the d_head-TP sharding
variants the 6-case chart predicts:

  · _gqa_attention_decode_long_ctx_cube_sp_pe_tp_dhead.py
        Cube-SP × PE-TP-d_head (Case 4 in chart). Per cube holds
        S_kv/C tokens of full d_head; per PE holds same tokens but
        only d_head/P dims. Partial Q·Kᵀ scores reduced intra-cube
        before softmax; outer (m,ℓ,O) merge two-phase (intra+inter).

  · _gqa_attention_decode_long_ctx_cube_tp_dhead_pe_sp.py
        Cube-TP-d_head × PE-SP (Case 5). Per cube holds full S_kv
        with only d_head/C dims; per PE holds S_kv/P of those dims.
        Partial scores reduced inter-cube (UCIe) before softmax.

Sweep dispatch (gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases.py) extended with two
new panels so the milestone-1h-gqa sweep covers all 6 cases.

Smoke test scripts/verify_case4_dhead_tp.py runs Cases 4/5/6 at
S_kv=2K to validate the kernels load and execute end-to-end.

Plus the figure-generation toolchain that produced the committed
PNGs in the prior commit (dd3337f):

  · paper_plot_gqa_4cases_summary.py    - 3-panel summary +
        2-panel (analytical / paired-measured) chart generator.
        _plot_comm now takes mode="analytical" | "paired".
  · paper_plot_gqa_kv_sharding_diagram.py  - 6-case 2-D KV-tensor
        diagram + companion comparison-table PNG.
  · measure_gqa_decode_placement_comm.py   - runs all 6 kernels at
        S_kv=8K, sums actual IPCQ-copy bytes from engine.op_log,
        scales partial-score AR ×128 to S_kv=1M, writes
        gqa_3cases_measured_comm.json (committed).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 11:26:05 -07:00
ywkang 821bbf26a2 gemm(bench): composite-vs-async dispatch comparison harness + single-op-model sweep
Adds the user-orchestrated async GEMM variants used in paper §3.4 to
contrast with the composite (load_ref) path:
  - matmul-async              : naive (tl.load full A+B, one tl.dot)
  - matmul-async-chunked      : depth-inf prefetch (all B-tiles queued)
  - matmul-async-chunked-db   : depth-2 double-buffer (TCM-bounded)
plus scripts/paper/paper_plot_gemm_async_vs_composite.py (4-way per-PE
TFLOPS sweep + figure) and the regenerated outputs under
1H_milestone_output/gemm/.

Sweep regenerated under the ADR-0064 D8 single-op cost model (commit
2d8271c). At K=3072 the composite-vs-async-tiled gap narrows from the
pre-D8 ~6.3x to ~2.8x (composite 7.18 / async-tiled 2.54 TFLOPS): D8
makes the async-tiled kernel's ~191 single-op dispatches 5x cheaper, so
its dispatch overhead drops to ~1.5us. Qualitative order persists:
composite > async-full (3.91) > async-tiled (2.54).

test_bench_registry.py: register matmul-async / -chunked / -chunked-db
(also picks up the earlier milestone-gqa-headline -> milestone-1h-gqa
rename already present in the tree).

--- Remaining work (resume here if interrupted) ---
- Paper §3.4 (03-gemm.tex sec:gemm-vs-async): finish naive->async-full /
  chunked->async-tiled rename AND reframe "FIXED_DMA=8 for DMA descriptors"
  to single-op(8) vs composite(40). Figure already copied to
  docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/figures/gemm_composite_vs_async_tflops.png.
- Paper §3.4 K=3072 para + mechanism #3: update dispatch breakdown to new
  model (191 single-op * 8c ~= 1.5us, was 4.6us) and headline gap
  ~6.3x -> ~2.8x.
- Rebuild build/main.pdf (tectonic) + verify via pdftotext.
- Then commit Group 3 (paper + diagrams + PDF).
- Table 2 / §2 prose / ADR-0064 D8 already done in 2d8271c.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 15:06:36 -07:00
mukesh 694e0cc9b9 paper(gqa): add 6-case per-PE memory + comm summary chart
Analytical plot generator + PNG covering the 4 sharding cases from
slide 17 plus the 2 d_head-TP variants (Cases 4, 5). Three panels:
per-PE HBM budget breakdown (Wq + Wk + Wv + Wo + 4.24 GB KV
headroom), per-PE KV memory at S_kv=1M, and per-PE communication
per output token (decode). Numbers match slide 17 (max KV context
~7.1M for the 64-way sharded cases).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 16:12:26 -07:00
ywkang 6b6e29968a paper: §2 platform deep-edit + §1 GQA framing + figure regen
§2 (KernBench Platform):
- Fix Table 2 HBM aggregate BW (1024 → 2048 GB/s); drop stale
  hbm_total_bw_gbs from topology.yaml (never read by sim_engine)
- Split PE_CPU / PE_SCHED fixed-cost row; disambiguate from the
  40-cycle command-dispatch FIXED term
- §2.2 two-pass: expand to describe Pass 1 timing and Pass 2 data
  data-correctness path
- §2.3 dispatch model: add motivation sentence for the
  descriptor-size linear form
- §2.4 Accuracy: reorder GEMM → All-reduce → Probe →
  Simplifications; drop FSIM aside (already covered by §4 Fig 5
  caption); soften 'every ns' → 'every modeled latency
  contribution'
- §2.5 HW config: add 64 TFLOP/s vs 2048 GB/s (~31 FLOP/byte)
  balance-point intuition and forward pointer to §5 GQA decode
- Fig 1 caption: separate illustrative topology from experimental
  configuration

§1: tighten GQA-as-primary-bandwidth-bottleneck framing.

Figures: regenerate SIP / CUBE architecture (SVG sources + PDF +
generator scripts).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 16:00:23 -07:00
mukesh 443ede99c7 gqa(prefill-4cases): add long-context prefill 4-cases comparative study
Mirrors the existing decode 4-cases study for prefill on the LLaMA-3.1-70B
single-KV-head group (h_q=8, h_kv=1, d_head=128) across 8 cubes × 8 PEs:

  Case 1  Cube-SP × PE-TP  → KV S_kv-Ring across cubes; Q/O T_q-split 64-way
  Case 2  Cube-Repl × PE-TP → full KV per cube; only CUBE 0's P PEs split T_q
  Case 3  Cube-Repl × PE-SP → full KV per cube; PEs SP on S_kv (intra-cube AR)
  Case 4  Cube-SP × PE-SP  → KV split 64-way + Q T_q-split across cubes
                              (Ring KV + per-cube intra-CUBE AR)  ★ optimal

Cases 2 and 3 use Q-axis tiling (TILE_Q) so the per-PE scratch is bounded
by TILE_Q × TILE_S_KV regardless of T_q (the full Q tensor would be
G·T_q·d_head·2 bytes which scales linearly with T_q and blew the 1 MB
budget at T_q≥128 without tiling).

Per-panel try/except in run_sweep tolerates per-panel failures so
sweep.json always lands with whichever cases succeed plus a failures
list. Case 4 uses configure_sfr_intercube_ring with the snake submesh
(2,4) which installs both the Ring E/W lanes and the intra_* lanes
needed for the intra-CUBE reduce — single SFR config for all 4 cases.

The plot script generates 4 PNGs (latency, traffic, memory, parallelism)
into 1H_milestone_output/gqa/long_ctx/. The parallelism chart shows
total compute work (active_PE × T_q_per_PE × S_kv_processed) — exposes
Case 3's 8× redundancy vs. Cases 1/2/4 which all do unique work.

gqa_prefill_long_ctx_4cases.py exposes run_sweep() rather than a @bench
decorator — the umbrella bench in the next commit invokes it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 13:06:08 -07:00
mukesh e45626c036 gqa: reorganize benches into gqa_helpers/ subpackage; drop legacy headline
Splits the GQA helpers into a dedicated subpackage to make room for the
prefill 4-cases study (next commit) and a single umbrella bench
(milestone-1h-gqa, after that).

Layout:
  benches/gqa_helpers/
    long_ctx/    — decode 4-cases kernels + sweep runner
    short_ctx/   — prefill/decode short-context kernels
    shared/      — _gqa_panel_helpers + decode_opt2 (context-agnostic)

The registry audit now skips subpackages so gqa_helpers/ (without a
leading underscore) doesn't get audited for @bench decorators.

Also drops the legacy milestone-gqa-headline bench, its
_gqa_attention_prefill_long kernel, 6 dependent prefill tests, the
paper_gqa_latency.py report harness, and the 3 stale headline-derived
PNGs the §6 wire-up referenced (paper will re-pull from the new
1H_milestone_output/gqa/long_ctx/ once §6 is updated).

The _ccl_cfg and _summarize_op_log helpers used to live in the
headline bench; extracted them to gqa_helpers/shared/_gqa_panel_helpers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 13:05:41 -07:00
mukesh 1fbe833992 gqa(decode-4cases): wire latency + engine occupancy into sweep.json; add comparative plot script (5C.F)
Bench changes:
  - new _end_to_end_ns(op_log) and _engine_occupancy_ns(op_log) helpers
    in milestone_gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases.py (mirror paper_gqa_latency.py)
  - _run_panel return dict now carries latency_ns + engine_occupancy_ns
    alongside op_log_summary, so sweep.json is the single source of truth
    for the comparative figures

Plot script:
  - new scripts/paper/paper_plot_gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases.py reads
    sweep.json and emits 3 PNGs to docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/figures/:
      gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases_latency.png   (end-to-end latency / case)
      gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases_traffic.png   (ipcq/dma op counts / case)
      gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases_memory.png    (KV bytes per cube / case)

Test changes:
  - 2 new tests verifying the helpers + _run_panel dict shape
  - lower smoke S_kv from 8192 -> 2048 (4x faster Case 2; assertions
    are S_kv-independent; one fold-loop iteration preserved)

18/18 tests pass in ~4 min.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-15 17:45:44 -07:00
ywkang 7f437a20bd paper(platform): edit-pass through §2 KernBench Platform done
- Reordered §2 subsections to follow the SIP → CUBE → PE → graph
  flow: Why KernBench → Device and execution model → Latency model
  → Modeled hardware configuration. Readers now meet the device
  hierarchy before the graph abstraction that re-uses it.
- §2.2 Device and execution model: starts with the SIP/CUBE/PE
  hierarchy paragraphs (each anchoring fig:sip-arch, fig:cube-arch,
  fig:pe-arch); then the runtime-API/sim-engine/components bullet
  list; then the atomic-vs-composite command distinction (corrects
  the prior over-narrow framing that read every PE command as
  composite -- atomic single-engine commands exist too, and PE_CPU
  itself runs control-plane work directly).
- §2.3 Latency model: opens with the four-contribution decomposition
  (per-node overhead, per-edge transmission, drain, queuing delay)
  and the latency_model schematic; retains existing The hardware as
  a graph / From graph to DES / Latency contributions / Congestion
  / Control-plane cost model / Accuracy paragraphs. Accuracy
  paragraph now closes on KernBench's sufficiency for *relative*
  HW/SW design trade-offs given analytic + external-simulator
  agreement.
- New figures and assets:
  - figures/sip_architecture.pdf  (SIP-level graph view)
  - figures/cube_architecture.pdf (CUBE-level zoom-in)
  - figures/latency_model.png      (conceptual latency-model
                                   schematic with per-node /
                                   per-edge / drain / queuing-delay
                                   colour coding)
  - figures/pe_architecture.png    (carried over)
- Source-of-truth generator for the latency schematic:
  scripts/paper/paper_latency_model_diagram.py (a report-only
  harness under scripts/paper/ per the /paper isolation rule).
- main.tex preamble: \usepackage{tikz} added (kept from prior
  sequence-diagram draft -- harmless now that the latency model is
  a PNG; left in to keep paragraph numbering stable).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-15 17:17:19 -07:00
mukesh 65c365f858 bench(milestone-gqa-headline): drop misleading single_user_/multi_user_ panels
The legacy panel names suggested batched serving semantics they never
had — all four modeled a single user with KV sharded differently
(C=1 single-cube; C=4 multi-cube Cube-SP), at toy dims (T_q=4, S_kv≤128).
The single-KV-group C=8 panel + the new milestone-gqa-decode-4cases
bench cover the meaningful comparisons; pytest regression already
covers C=1/C=4 configurations end-to-end at richer scale.

Changes:
- milestone_gqa_headline.py: drop the 4 legacy panels; _PANELS now
  contains only single_kv_group_prefill_gqa_c8_p8. Update docstring.
- tests/attention/test_milestone_gqa_headline.py: drop the 3 legacy-
  panel architectural tests (Ring-KV traffic, root-only decode write,
  per-CUBE distributed output) and test_decode_panels_use_real_gqa
  (no decode panels in this bench anymore). Equivalent properties
  are asserted in test_milestone_gqa_single_kv_group_prefill_panel.py
  (64 dma_writes, 896 ipcq_copy) and test_milestone_gqa_decode_4cases.py
  (1 dma_write at cube 6, 189 ipcq_copy).
- tests/attention/test_milestone_gqa_single_kv_group_prefill_panel.py:
  drop test_existing_prefill_panel_runner_backward_compat (it exercised
  multi_user_prefill_gqa which no longer exists).
- scripts/paper/paper_plot_gqa.py: replace the 4 legacy _LABELS entries
  with the single single_kv_group_prefill_gqa_c8_p8 label.
- Regenerate 1H_milestone_output/gqa_headline/sweep.json from the new
  panel set.

Verification: 9/9 tests pass across the 3 affected test files.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-15 14:50:25 -07:00
ywkang dd525bfcb7 paper: add /paper skill + 1H HW-SW codesign report (GEMM, All-Reduce, fused GQA)
New `/paper` slash-command skill that synthesizes ADR/SPEC content and live
KernBench benchmark results into a sectioned LaTeX technical paper compiled
to PDF with Tectonic (auto-installed). The skill negotiates a TOC, grounds
every number in committed artifacts or fresh bench runs, and keeps
report-only benches isolated.

This commit also includes the first generated report:
- docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/ — main.tex + per-section .tex, figures,
  toc.md contract, and the built 8-page main.pdf. Covers the platform
  (source-level kernels, latency model + accuracy, HW config from
  topology.yaml), GEMM via composite command, All-Reduce via PE_IPCQ, and
  fused GQA combining both, plus discussion/conclusion/2H future work.
- scripts/paper/ — isolated report harnesses (not registered benches):
  paper_gqa_latency.py harvests per-panel GQA end-to-end latency + engine
  occupancy (the milestone only emitted op-counts); paper_plot_gqa.py
  renders the GQA figures.

GEMM/All-Reduce reuse committed milestone figures/CSVs; GQA results are
generated fresh. Honest flags retained: PE_CPU dispatch cost is 0 in this
config, and the proposed two-composite softmax_merge decode is marked
designed-not-measured.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 22:15:14 -07:00