Commit Graph

292 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ywkang 13f5cbc317 gqa decode: fix cube_base output-store; measure batch scaling on one SIP
Concurrency fix (completes the cube_base change): the decode kernel's
output store o_base still used the global cube_id while every load used
the user-local cube_local. For a single user (cube_base=0) they coincide,
so it was masked; a second batched user (cube_base>0) overshot its o shard
into an unmapped VA, mis-decoded to a phantom sip0.cube0.pe8 and raised a
RoutingError. Switch o_base to cube_local (one line); single-user results
are byte-identical (decode smoke/correctness pass).

Batch harness (un-skipped): create all users' tensors first, then submit
all launches deferred and drain together, so deploys don't drive an
already-submitted launch and serialize the batch. Concurrent users on
disjoint CUBE groups now overlap to within 3-5% of the single-user
latency. Swept B in {1,2,capacity} at 8K (high-B dense runs are the
expensive ones; throughput is near-linear in B).

Measured result: aggregate throughput at a full SIP rises from 0.86
(1-kv-per-cube, 2 users) to 1.41 requests/us (8-kv-per-cube, 16 users) —
the dense mapping wins throughput, the spread mapping wins latency.
S5.2 batch paragraph updated projected -> measured; add batch_scaling
figure and plot_batch_scaling.py.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 17:37:10 -07:00
ywkang 8c108154a7 plot: fix Fig 16 suptitle to match KV-footprint panel
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 16:25:50 -07:00
ywkang 711a9a257f gqa short-context: exclude KV deploy from wall; correct HBM peak; batch scaffold
Metric fixes (test harnesses, deploy artifact + wrong constant):
- wall = max(t_end) - min(t_start): exclude the one-time KV-cache deploy
  from the measured decode/prefill step (it was 92-99% of wall, mapping-
  invariant, and masked the real per-mapping separation).
- PEAK_PE_HBM_BPS 128 -> 256 B/ns (8 channels/PE x 32 GB/s); the old value
  was half the modeled per-PE HBM BW, so hbm_bw_util read >1.0 once wall
  was corrected. All six short-context sweep CSVs regenerated/repatched.

Result: the four KV mappings now separate along a {64,32,16,8}-active-PE
ladder (decode 8-kv/1-kv = 4.8x at 8K, 7.4x at 64K), not "modest/tied" as
before; decode is bandwidth-bound at 46-76% of the 256 GB/s per-PE ceiling.

Report (S5.2 rewrite):
- Replace the tied-wall / 8x-per-PE-util claims (both deploy artifacts)
  with the corrected separation and a density trade-off (per-CUBE KV
  footprint, Fig 16 top panel switched to a wall-invariant metric).
- Add a projected latency-vs-batched-throughput analysis (marked
  projected, not measured): dense mappings win throughput, 1-kv wins
  latency; converges at long context.
- Regenerate Fig 15/16/17/18; fix plot script hardcoded ROOT path.

Batch experiment (Part 2, cube_base):
- Add backward-compatible cube_base=0 scalar to the decode kernel so a
  batched user placed at DPPolicy.cube_start addresses 0-based shards.
  Default preserves single-user behavior (32 decode tests pass unchanged).
- New batch harness (skipped): concurrent B>=2 launches hit a sim routing
  issue (sip0.cube0.pe8); single-user path verified. Concurrency fix next.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 16:25:04 -07:00
ywkang cb6d21f145 report(1H): tighten §5 GQA (mapping tie, taxonomy bridge, dedup, Summary)
- Soften short-context claim: 1-kv-/8-kv-per-cube are tied at 8K and
  separate as context grows (1-kv faster at the large end).
- Add a bridge noting the six-case placement taxonomy (§5.1) is the
  long-context lens; short context turns on head-to-CUBE distribution.
- Remove caption-duplicating numbers from the long-context conclusion.
- Reduce the closing subsection to a GQA-scoped Summary; defer the
  cross-cutting hardware-investment thesis to the Discussion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 10:33:56 -07:00
ywkang d88e6cc72e report(1H): rebuild main.pdf
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 10:22:06 -07:00
ywkang edb30326ce report(1H): add Agentic Workloads (§6) and HW-Spec Search (§7) sections
- §6 Supporting Agentic Workloads: how the fused GQA design extends to
  agentic fan-out/fan-in; three-layer split (framework/runtime/kernel);
  Stationary-KV vs Distributed-Q execution policies.
- §7 Hardware Performance-Spec Search for GQA: WIP stub (sweep intent
  over GEMM TFLOPS, MATH-engine ALUs, CUBE↔CUBE and SIP↔SIP BW).
- Renumber Discussion/Conclusion/Future-Work to 08/09/10; update
  main.tex input order and toc.md.
- Add Agentic_Runtime_Architecture.md design note; rebuild main.pdf.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 10:20:27 -07:00
mukesh d0db9ff40e gqa-decode: topology-agnostic reduce + multi-model attention bench
Make reduce_mlo derive its submesh dimensions (sub_w, sub_h, root_col,
root_row, root_cube) from C at call time, with peer-existence guards on
every inter-cube send/recv so any C ≥ 1 completes cleanly (previously
hardcoded to C=8's 4×2 mesh; non-rectangular C like 7 or 12 hit
IpcqDeadlock at the root cube's east receive). Byte-equal at C=8 —
existing composite digest tests still pass 8/8.

Callsites in the four Case-6 kernels (primitive / primitive-tiled /
composite / composite_extended) updated to pass C into reduce_mlo and
use root_cube_for(C) for the final tl.store gate.

Add the multi-model attention bench: sweeps the composite kernel at
S_kv=128K across six GQA models (Gemma-2 27B, LLaMA-3 8B, Qwen 2.5 7B,
LLaMA-3 70B, Qwen 2.5 72B, Command R+), with per-model topology
C = h_q (cubes per KV group = query heads per KV group). Captures
per-op-kind occupancy (matmul GEMM+MATH, comm DMA) alongside latency
and PE_CPU dispatch. Three-panel plot writes to bench-output and
paper-figures dir.

Headline result: same-h_q-different-family models land within 0.2 µs
(model-agnostic given fixed h_kv=1 per KV group + d_head=128); latency
climbs 263 → 492 µs as C climbs 2 → 12, driven by reduce depth
(comm/matmul ratio 0.4 → 0.6 across the sweep).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 09:54:31 -07:00
mukesh 23a2bc3fb3 gqa-decode-composite: measure primitive hand-tiled (16×16×16) latency
Switch primitive hand-tiled Q·Kᵀ / P·V from a deferred-K-sum tl.dot
chain to per-block GemmCmd writes into a shared (M, N) out handle
(implicit MAC-side accumulation). Full-shape coarse Q / K_T / V loads
carry data-mode correctness; per-block DMAs remain for the streaming
architecture dispatch story. The kernel now runs in engine mode
end-to-end, so its 128K latency is measured instead of derived as
primitive + Δdispatch. Drop the coarse-primitive baseline from the
sweep and plots; keep the kernel file for reference.

At S_kv=128K: primitive hand-tiled = 959.5 µs vs composite = 460.7 µs
(2.08× from 5 235 vs 94 PE_CPU commands).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-13 21:49:57 -07:00
mukesh eec61838b5 sweep+plot: add primitive hand-tiled (16×16×16) variant to Case-6 decode composite study
Wires a fourth variant into the Cube-SP × PE-SP long-context decode
composite command-form study to surface the worst-case PE_CPU dispatch
inflation that the coarse composite forms delegate to PE_SCHEDULER
(ADR-0065): per-block DMA of Q/K/V slices, tl.dot per 16³ block,
deferred K-inner sum outside the K loop.

Renamed _tiled.py → _hand_tiled_16x16x16.py; coarse-primitive kernel
retained for the 4-cases bench, paper scripts, and the golden byte-equal
regression guard.

New breakdown bar chart at S_kv=128K shows engine (~460 μs) dominates
all three variants; hand-tiled adds ~68 μs PE_CPU dispatch on top —
composite forms sit essentially on the memory-bound floor.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-13 09:28:57 -07:00
eusonice f8caf2e16c report(gqa-short): draft results subsection (mode + composite-tier comparison, 4 figures) 2026-06-26 16:01:32 -07:00
eusonice 09e70bd516 test: fix CSV output paths in 3 sweep files (each variant now writes a unique CSV) 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice e20e1f7362 plot: merge plot scripts into single plot_short_context.py 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice 3437d7e079 sweep: 6 short-context CSVs (3 variants x prefill+decode) + 6 wall/util figures 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice 3da116d40d adr-0070: gqa short context attention prefill/decode + 3 composite tiers 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice f7aa8134b9 test: 3-variant sweep (baseline + composite + composite-fused) for prefill/decode 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice a455ae61b4 sim: pin compute outputs and on-chip recv slots for composite operands 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice 1971ac731c add three gqa attention kernel variants for short context length 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice a98e93110b short context length composite command 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice f08dda3bd4 test short context length attention kernel 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
eusonice 7d90d53d4d short context length attention kernel 2026-06-26 15:59:21 -07:00
ywkang faf011dae5 paper(ipcq): regen alternatives figures + comparison plot + allreduce section
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 19:19:55 -07:00
ywkang 1dade267ff experiment(gqa-decode): 16x16x16 MAC-block dispatch model
Research artifact (NOT wired into the production sweep) for the decode composite-vs-primitive investigation. Models a primitive decode kernel that hand-blocks each tl.dot into 16x16x16 GemmCmds, charging per-MAC-block PE_CPU dispatch -- testing whether faithfully charging the dispatch that the composite form offloads to PE_SCHEDULER flips the 'composite gives no decode latency benefit' result.

Finding: it does NOT. Even with up to 512 serialized blocking GemmCmds per matmul (vs 2 coarse tl.dot), end-to-end decode latency is unchanged (8192: 28.9us, 32768: 114.9us) -- the inter-cube (m,l,O) reduce DMA tail dominates and the local-attention GEMM/dispatch sits in critical-path slack. Confirms the two-regime conclusion (24c7054): composite helps compute-bound prefill, not memory/reduce-bound decode.

Caveats: measured at S_kv 8K/32K (reduce-dominated); large-S_kv streaming regime extrapolated only. The -5.5% tiled<untiled is reduce-tail ordering noise, not fully nailed down.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 18:24:26 -07:00
ywkang 24c705419e paper(gqa): two-regime "use of composite commands" — decode + compute-bound prefill
Complete the composite-command study across both attention regimes and
write up the result, resolving when the composite command helps latency.

Decode (memory-bound, T_q=1, M=8): the command form is latency-neutral —
the kernel is bound by KV streaming and the MAC array is near-idle, so the
composite's only benefit here is host-issue offload (O(n_tiles) -> O(1)
PE_CPU commands). Figure: gqa_decode_long_ctx_composite (latency flat,
command count saturates).

Prefill (compute-bound, large M=G*T_q tile-filling): add three command-form
variants of a single-rank FlashAttention prefill kernel
(_gqa_prefill_compute_bound: primitive / composite / composite_extended).
Here the composite's scheduler-internal per-tile DMA<->compute pipeline
keeps the MAC array fed while the primitive's blocking tl.dot starves it,
so composite wins on MAC utilization (68% flat -> 83%) and wall-clock
(19% faster at ctx=1024), with the margin growing with context (deeper
P.V reduction = more tiles to pipeline) — the compute-bound mirror of the
GEMM result in section 3. Figure: gqa_prefill_compute_bound (latency +
MAC util). Sweep wired as GQA_1H_SWEEPS=prefill_cb; tests cover structure,
e2e, and composite<primitive in the compute-bound regime.

The synthesis: composite has two benefits set by roofline position —
host-issue offload (always) and MAC-array feeding (compute-bound only).
Decode exercises the first, prefill both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 17:04:26 -07:00
ywkang cd6f0ed91d feat(gqa): Case-6 composite-command decode variants + on-chip-operand DMA fix
Add two command-form variants of the Case-6 (Cube-SP x PE-SP) long-context
decode kernel alongside the primitive baseline:
  - composite: per-tile GEMMs issued as one coarse tl.composite over the
    full S_local (PE_SCHEDULER tiles/streams K,V) -- O(1) PE_CPU commands
    vs the primitive kernel's O(n_tiles).
  - composite_extended: Q.K^T composite + softmax_merge recipe composite
    (ADR-0065), folding the per-tile online merge + P.V.

Extract the shared two-level (m,l,O) reduce into _gqa_mlo_reduce and
refactor the baseline to use it (byte-equal, guarded by a 64-rank
command-stream digest test).

Engine fix: _make_compute_out omitted pinned=True, so an on-chip TCM
compute result consumed as a composite GEMM operand was scheduled as an
HBM DMA_READ of its bit-61 scratch address -> PhysAddrError in data mode.
Mark compute outputs pinned (resident), matching the composite
auto-output and recipe scratch handles. .pinned is read only by the
tiling DMA gate, so this is byte-equal for existing benches.

Add the composite sweep (emit-level PE_CPU dispatch to 1M + data-mode
latency to 128K), its plot, umbrella wiring (GQA_1H_SWEEPS=composite),
and tests (refactor guard, dispatch saturation, engine-fix, e2e).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-23 16:07:41 -07:00
ywkang e9a5c438e3 paper(1H): 6-case GQA long-ctx + IPCQ design alternatives + GEMM terminology
- §6 GQA: rewrite long-context decode from 4-case to 6-case. Data
  Placement Policy now presents the six placement options and their
  intrinsic per-PE memory / per-token comm costs (no winner predicted);
  the long-context subsection selects the best placement for that regime
  (Case 6 ★, both-axes S_kv shard) from the measured 6-case sweep. Add
  KV-sharding diagram + analytical budget/summary figures.
- Regenerate the 6-row decode sweep (milestone-1h-gqa) and the
  sweep-dependent decode panels (latency/traffic/parallelism/memory) so
  figures, prose, and sweep_decode.json are mutually consistent.
- §5 All-Reduce: add IPCQ design alternatives (architecture + decision
  matrix) as design-rationale schematics (illustrative step-counts, not
  measured) and the bench-generated topology diagram.
- §4 GEMM: rename "user-orchestrated/user-level" -> "kernel-orchestrated/
  kernel-level" (orchestration runs in the kernel program vs the
  scheduler-orchestrated composite); minor accuracy fixes (7.18 TFLOP/s
  ~10% below peak; ~781 ns DMA).
- Recompile build/main.pdf.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-22 00:55:54 -07:00
mukesh bb668a3ac3 paper(gqa): derive (m,l,O) AR per-PE cost from kernel topology
Replaces the unsourced 32 KB/layer placeholder in the analytical chart
with T*(N-1)/N where T = h_q * S_q * (d_head*2 + 8) ~ 2.1 KB
(per-PE (m, l, O) payload) and N is the participant count of the
reduce-only chain per stage. Cases 2/3/6 analytical bars now match
the simulator-measured numbers within ~10% (was 6-30x over).

Also:
- Bumps the measurement S_kv from 8 K to 64 K to verify Cases 1, 2, 3, 6
  are genuinely S_kv-independent and Cases 4, 5 scale linearly.
- In-bar descriptor on the paired chart is now wrapped to fit the bar
  width, black, no background box, and centered between the analytical
  and measured bars so the label applies to both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 15:38:20 -07:00
mukesh 0662c76fa7 paper(ipcq): de-emphasize flow-diagram outer frame so inner flow stands out
Drops the per-case panel outline from linewidth 2.2 to 0.9 with 85% alpha.
The case-color frame still anchors each panel but no longer competes
with the swimlanes, flit packets, and annotations inside.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 15:01:09 -07:00
mukesh 37dc48fd27 paper(ipcq): add latency-model-style flow + stacked architecture diagrams
Adds two new IPCQ architecture views in the latency_model.png aesthetic:
a 2x2 flow figure (one per case) and a 4x1 stacked figure for taller
horizontal panels. Refactors per-case panel drawing into shared helpers
and disambiguates the flit labels (HMQ desc -> Hd so it does not
collide with data D). Two-row legend keys.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 14:55:59 -07:00
mukesh 7c45047e93 paper(ipcq): swap control-data overlay for latency PNG in figures/
Drops the control-data overlay from the paper figures folder and
adds the per-send latency cycle-stack PNG instead.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 14:06:32 -07:00
mukesh 73e0b315fe paper(gqa): table cleanup — drop measured-comm column, narrower fig, wrapped title
Removes the (measured) comm column, widens the Notes column with
shorter wrapped text, scales the table figure down, and wraps the
heading to two lines so it sits flush with the table.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 14:02:42 -07:00
mukesh 1552028c25 paper(ipcq): add IPCQ vs HW alternatives comparative study
6 generated figures comparing IPCQ (chosen) against the 3 HW alternatives
(Doorbell+Polling, HMQ, RDMA-CQ): architecture blocks, latency stack,
op counts, sequence flow, decision matrix, and control/data plane overlay.

Three figures also copied into the paper's figures/ folder for inclusion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 13:27:23 -07:00
mukesh 56c51b184a paper(gqa): refresh 4 decode 6-case PNGs in figures/ with actual 6-case content
The previous commit (8102ddb) renamed the figures-dir
gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases_*.png → 6cases_*.png but only the rename
was staged; the cp that brought the regenerated 6-case content
landed after `git add`, so the committed bytes were still the old
4-case ones. This commit syncs the bytes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 11:51:30 -07:00
mukesh 8102ddbe30 paper(gqa): rename long-ctx artifacts to gqa_long_ctx_6cases_* and add 4 decode 6-case charts
Filename cleanup so every long-ctx GQA artifact has a consistent
"gqa_long_ctx_6cases_*" prefix (or "gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_*"
for decode-only charts). Old "4cases" / mixed names retired.

Renames (long_ctx + figures, content unchanged):
  gqa_hbm_budget.png                  -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_hbm_budget.png
  gqa_4cases_summary.png              -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_summary.png
  gqa_4cases_memory_comm_analytical   -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_memory_comm_analytical.png
  gqa_4cases_memory_comm_paired       -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_memory_comm_paired.png
  gqa_kv_sharding_6cases_diagram      -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_kv_sharding_diagram.png
  gqa_kv_sharding_6cases_table        -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_kv_sharding_table.png
  gqa_3cases_measured_comm.json       -> gqa_long_ctx_6cases_measured_comm.json
  gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases_*.png    -> gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_*.png
                                         (figures dir; long_ctx never had old)

New 4-chart 6-case set in long_ctx output dir (regenerated by
paper_plot_gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases.py, which now reads all 6
sweep_decode.json panels — Cases 1-6 with the same colour scheme
used elsewhere: red = overflow per-PE HBM, grey = neutral, blue
= Pareto-best ★):

  gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_latency.png
  gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_memory.png
  gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_parallelism.png
  gqa_decode_long_ctx_6cases_traffic.png

Generator scripts updated to write the new filenames + handle the
two new d_head-TP variants (Cases 4, 5) in their per-PE memory and
active-PE-count helpers. Figure widths bumped 10 -> 12 in to fit 6
multi-line case labels.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 11:49:03 -07:00
mukesh 84bb418e1e gqa(decode): add d_head-TP kernels + measurement runner + figure generators
Two new long-ctx decode attention kernels for the d_head-TP sharding
variants the 6-case chart predicts:

  · _gqa_attention_decode_long_ctx_cube_sp_pe_tp_dhead.py
        Cube-SP × PE-TP-d_head (Case 4 in chart). Per cube holds
        S_kv/C tokens of full d_head; per PE holds same tokens but
        only d_head/P dims. Partial Q·Kᵀ scores reduced intra-cube
        before softmax; outer (m,ℓ,O) merge two-phase (intra+inter).

  · _gqa_attention_decode_long_ctx_cube_tp_dhead_pe_sp.py
        Cube-TP-d_head × PE-SP (Case 5). Per cube holds full S_kv
        with only d_head/C dims; per PE holds S_kv/P of those dims.
        Partial scores reduced inter-cube (UCIe) before softmax.

Sweep dispatch (gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases.py) extended with two
new panels so the milestone-1h-gqa sweep covers all 6 cases.

Smoke test scripts/verify_case4_dhead_tp.py runs Cases 4/5/6 at
S_kv=2K to validate the kernels load and execute end-to-end.

Plus the figure-generation toolchain that produced the committed
PNGs in the prior commit (dd3337f):

  · paper_plot_gqa_4cases_summary.py    - 3-panel summary +
        2-panel (analytical / paired-measured) chart generator.
        _plot_comm now takes mode="analytical" | "paired".
  · paper_plot_gqa_kv_sharding_diagram.py  - 6-case 2-D KV-tensor
        diagram + companion comparison-table PNG.
  · measure_gqa_decode_placement_comm.py   - runs all 6 kernels at
        S_kv=8K, sums actual IPCQ-copy bytes from engine.op_log,
        scales partial-score AR ×128 to S_kv=1M, writes
        gqa_3cases_measured_comm.json (committed).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 11:26:05 -07:00
mukesh dd3337f2e4 paper(gqa): add 6-case KV-sharding figures (analytical + measured)
Six PNGs covering the 6-case decode KV-placement story, copied
into both the kernbench 1H_milestone_output staging dir and the
1H-codesign-paper figures/ dir:

  · gqa_hbm_budget.png                 - per-PE HBM budget bar
  · gqa_4cases_summary.png             - 3-panel: HBM + KV mem + comm
  · gqa_4cases_memory_comm_analytical  - 2-panel: KV mem + comm (analytical)
  · gqa_4cases_memory_comm_paired      - 2-panel: + measured overlay
  · gqa_kv_sharding_6cases_diagram     - 2-D KV-tensor view (Y=S_kv, X=d_head)
  · gqa_kv_sharding_6cases_table       - companion comparison table

The original 4-case gqa_4cases_summary.png is updated to the new
6-case 3-panel layout. Generator scripts and Phase-1 d_head-TP
kernels remain untracked - separate commit scope.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-18 11:22:57 -07:00
ywkang b6315c3c90 paper(1H): reflect D8 single-op cost model in §2/§3.4 + figure/diagram regen
Two strands bundled as the 1H-codesign-paper refresh unit:

(A) This session — single-op cost-model reflection (depends on 2d8271c):
  - §2 Table 2 (tab:hw): split "FIXED per command" into "FIXED per
    single-op command" (8 cycles) and "FIXED per composite command"
    (40 cycles); §2 dispatch-overhead prose updated to the two-class split.
  - §3.4 (sec:gemm-vs-async): rename paragraph headers + prose to
    async-full / async-tiled; "atomic" -> "single-op" throughout; reframe
    mechanism #3 from the old DMA-only fast-path to the single-op
    fast-path. Headline narrative now: even with EVERY single-op cmd
    (96 DMA + 48 dot + 47 add) charged the light 8-cycle FIXED, composite
    still wins ~2.8x at K=3072 purely on command-count structure (1 vs
    192 commands) -- down from the pre-D8 ~6.3x, and explicitly NOT a
    modelling artifact. Numbers refreshed from the regenerated sweep:
    async-full 3.83->3.91, async-tiled 1.14->~2.53, under-tile corner
    1.06->1.21, depth-2 vs depth-inf spread <1%. New figure wired in.
  - build/main.pdf rebuilt (tectonic); pdftotext-verified (no broken
    refs; Table 2 split, single-op terms, 2.8x/2.53/192-host-commands
    all present).

(B) Prior-session paper work riding along uncommitted: §4 all-reduce
    deep-edit, §5 GQA, §6 discussion trims; milestone_1h_ccl.py plot
    label "FSIM" -> "H2 2025 SW queue baseline"; regenerated diagrams
    under docs/diagrams/** and gemm output PNGs under
    1H_milestone_output/gemm/. (Composite-window gemm plots are
    unaffected by D8 — D8 only changes single-op dispatch FIXED, which
    the composite window excludes.)

All TODO items for the D8 single-op extension are now complete and
pushed across 3 commits (2d8271c cost-model+ADR+tests, 821bbf2 bench
harness, this paper refresh). Full regression green (826 passed, 1
skipped). No remaining work.

NOTE for review (carried from 2d8271c): ADR-0065's "2x CPU-offload win"
headline for GQA decode opt2 may want a refresh to the post-D8 ~1.87x.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 15:12:31 -07:00
ywkang 821bbf26a2 gemm(bench): composite-vs-async dispatch comparison harness + single-op-model sweep
Adds the user-orchestrated async GEMM variants used in paper §3.4 to
contrast with the composite (load_ref) path:
  - matmul-async              : naive (tl.load full A+B, one tl.dot)
  - matmul-async-chunked      : depth-inf prefetch (all B-tiles queued)
  - matmul-async-chunked-db   : depth-2 double-buffer (TCM-bounded)
plus scripts/paper/paper_plot_gemm_async_vs_composite.py (4-way per-PE
TFLOPS sweep + figure) and the regenerated outputs under
1H_milestone_output/gemm/.

Sweep regenerated under the ADR-0064 D8 single-op cost model (commit
2d8271c). At K=3072 the composite-vs-async-tiled gap narrows from the
pre-D8 ~6.3x to ~2.8x (composite 7.18 / async-tiled 2.54 TFLOPS): D8
makes the async-tiled kernel's ~191 single-op dispatches 5x cheaper, so
its dispatch overhead drops to ~1.5us. Qualitative order persists:
composite > async-full (3.91) > async-tiled (2.54).

test_bench_registry.py: register matmul-async / -chunked / -chunked-db
(also picks up the earlier milestone-gqa-headline -> milestone-1h-gqa
rename already present in the tree).

--- Remaining work (resume here if interrupted) ---
- Paper §3.4 (03-gemm.tex sec:gemm-vs-async): finish naive->async-full /
  chunked->async-tiled rename AND reframe "FIXED_DMA=8 for DMA descriptors"
  to single-op(8) vs composite(40). Figure already copied to
  docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/figures/gemm_composite_vs_async_tflops.png.
- Paper §3.4 K=3072 para + mechanism #3: update dispatch breakdown to new
  model (191 single-op * 8c ~= 1.5us, was 4.6us) and headline gap
  ~6.3x -> ~2.8x.
- Rebuild build/main.pdf (tectonic) + verify via pdftotext.
- Then commit Group 3 (paper + diagrams + PDF).
- Table 2 / §2 prose / ADR-0064 D8 already done in 2d8271c.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 15:06:36 -07:00
ywkang 2d8271c981 perf(cost-model): D8 single-op-cmd fast-path (FIXED=8 single-op / 40 composite)
ADR-0064 D8 broadened from "DMA fast-path" to "single-op-cmd fast-path":
every single-op command (DmaRead/DmaWrite/Gemm/Math/Copy) now pays the
lighter FIXED=8; only CompositeCmd keeps the 40-cycle control-path FIXED
(it alone needs scheduler plan generation + per-tile RW-hazard tracking +
completion wiring). Renamed knob fixed_per_dma_cmd_cycles ->
fixed_per_single_op_cmd_cycles. dispatch_cycles now branches on
"is CompositeCmd" rather than enumerating DMA types.

Term choice: "single-op" (not "atomic", which read as sync/async) — the
axis is composition (one engine op vs fused multi-op plan), orthogonal to
timing. single-op <-> composite.

Tests: test_pe_cost_model.py updated to the single-op surface (defaults,
fast-path over all 5 single-op cmd types, composite general path, yaml
override). All green.

Recalibrated tests/attention/test_gqa_decode_opt2.py
::test_opt3_dispatch_exceeds_opt2 — NOT a regression: D8 makes single-op
cmds 5x cheaper, so opt2's two-composite fusion win over opt3's many
single-ops narrowed from pre-D8 ~3.7x to ~1.87x (opt3=224 > opt2=120).
The CPU-offload invariant (opt2 cheaper) still holds; only the model-
dependent ">2x" constant was over-fit to the old uniform-40 model. Gate
now: direction + >1.5x margin (matches sibling R-sweep test's stated
"absolute ratio informative-only" philosophy).
NOTE for review: ADR-0065's "2x CPU-offload win" headline may want a
refresh to reflect the post-D8 ~1.87x — left to user (architectural doc).

Full regression: 826 passed, 1 skipped (tests/ excl. tests/gemm).

--- Remaining work (resume here if interrupted) ---
5. Re-run scripts/paper/paper_plot_gemm_async_vs_composite.py with new
   cost model; verify async-tiled dispatch overhead drops (~4576ns ->
   ~1536ns expected) and the composite-vs-async-tiled gap narrows from
   the prior ~6.3x at K=3072.
6. Copy regenerated gemm_composite_vs_async_tflops.png to
   docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/figures/.
7. Paper §3.4 (03-gemm.tex sec:gemm-vs-async): finish naive->async-full /
   chunked->async-tiled rename AND reframe FIXED_DMA wording to single-op
   vs composite (currently still says "lighter FIXED for DMA descriptors,
   FIXED_DMA=8"). Table 2 (02-platform) + §2 dispatch prose already done.
8. Paper §3.4 K=3072 corner para + mechanism #3: update dispatch breakdown
   to new model (96 DMA*8 + 95 single-op*8 ≈ 1.5us vs old 4.6us); update
   headline ratio if it changed.
9. Rebuild docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/build/main.pdf (tectonic) +
   verify via pdftotext.
10. Then this is the bench-harness + paper commits (Groups 2 & 3).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 15:04:53 -07:00
ywkang 0c6ca0aaed paper(gemm): inline §3.1 pipeline-stage chain; drop display equation
The five-stage chain was set as a centered display equation, which
overflowed the column and clipped the last 'DMA_WRITE' label. The
inline prose right below it also repeated the same chain in a
shorter form. Consolidate into one inline parenthetical listing the
five stage names, and reuse 'flows through the chain' for the
self-routing description — no clipping, no repetition.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 10:40:23 -07:00
ywkang b64c43b947 paper(gemm): drop in-chart titles + subtitles, let LaTeX caption carry that
The matplotlib title and gray subtitle were duplicating what the
figure caption already says in the LaTeX source, and crowding the
top of every chart. Drop both — chart now leaves the title/subtitle
slots blank and the caption is the single source of truth for
chart titling.

Re-render all 5 GEMM figures (mac util measured, mac util theoretical
vs measured, stage breakdown, HBM BW util, per-PE TFLOPS) and resync
into docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/figures/. No data changes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 10:29:13 -07:00
ywkang e8b7f4f064 paper(gemm): per-PE HBM BW + TFLOPS evaluation plots; unify peak to 8 TFLOP/s
Two new evaluation plots for §3 GEMM, both using the composite window
as the denominator (the up-front tl.load of A in load_ref is therefore
excluded — only HBM traffic and compute inside the composite count):

- gemm_hbm_bw_util.png: per-PE HBM bandwidth utilization against the
  256 GB/s per-PE ceiling. Answers "is this workload memory-bound on
  this configuration?" — small/single-tile shapes sit at 22–46%
  (pipeline-fill-limited), large or output-write-dominated shapes
  saturate (≥85%).

- gemm_per_pe_tflops.png: per-PE GEMM throughput against the 8 TFLOP/s
  engine peak. The deep-K K=3072 load_ref case lands at
  7.18 TFLOP/s (~90% of peak) — the configuration's clean win.
  ref_ref at the same shape drops to 3.83 TFLOP/s because the second
  operand doubles HBM pressure and the kernel hits the BW ceiling.
  The variant gap on this chart is the operational cost of NOT
  pre-staging the activation.

Both charts compare two operand-staging variants on every shape:
load_ref ("activation pre-staged", weight-only HBM streaming) and
ref_ref (both A and W streamed from HBM). load_load is omitted —
with both operands pre-staged the composite carries no HBM traffic
and the BW metric collapses to 0.

Analytic / measured peak unified to the single hardware spec
(8.0 TFLOP/s = 8000 flops/ns). T_STAGE is now derived as
tile_flops / peak (= 16.384 ns for the 32×64×32 tile) rather than
the previous hardcoded 16 ns, so MAC efficiency and per-PE TFLOPS%
share the same denominator and never disagree. Side effect: max
analytic-vs-measured gap tightens from 2.2 ppt to 1.4 ppt across
the sweep.

§3 Results restructured: lead with the two new evaluation plots
(BW saturation, achieved throughput), then the MAC-utilization
analytic-vs-measured chart serves as the validation step, then the
per-stage engine wall-clock as the supporting diagnostic. §3
Analysis updated to use the load_ref / ref_ref contrast as the
hardware-software boundary line that motivates the GQA kernel of §5.

§2.4 Accuracy claim updated to match: GEMM analytic-vs-measured
agreement is now "within 1.4 ppt across every swept shape", from
~7.7% at single-tile up to ~90% at K=3072. Subtitle/title vertical
stacking glitch in the matplotlib charts fixed in passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 10:24:42 -07:00
ywkang 23992548f7 gemm(perf): fix back-to-back DMA pipelining + tighten analytic model
Three coupled fixes that recover small-tile GEMM pipeline efficiency
from 53% to 88% (32x3072x32 load_ref, composite_window basis).

1. PE_DMA channel-hold (ADR-0014 D4 clarified): both the
   _handle_with_hooks (PeInternalTxn) and _pipeline_process
   (TileToken) paths used to hold the cap=1 DMA channel through the
   full HBM round-trip, which double-serialized with the HBM_CTRL's
   own per-PC `available_at` model and prevented back-to-back tile
   DMAs from amortizing their per-request head latency. Channel is
   now released after the request is enqueued onto the next hop;
   HBM serialization is HBM_CTRL's responsibility alone.

   Tests: new test_pe_dma_back_to_back_pipelining as the oracle
   (asserts wall < 75% of strict-serialized N x single_op). Existing
   test_pe_dma_record_start_after_channel_acquire rewritten to assert
   t_start clustering (channel released fast) instead of the old
   round-trip-hold invariant. test_pe_dma_same_channel_serializes
   still passes — HBM_CTRL preserves ordering.

   Probe regression: PE→local-HBM 32 KiB stays at 141 ns
   (single-request, unaffected).

2. milestone_1h_gemm bench: matmul_composite was reading MATMUL_M/K/N
   env vars at module load, so every sweep row replayed the cached
   256³ result; values now read inside run(). Drops the stale
   sys.modules deletion hack.

3. Analytic ideal-pipeline model: dropped the (n_mn-1)·dma_w_per_pair
   penalty (over-pessimistic for under-tile shapes — it pushed
   measured > theoretical) and replaced the D_STAGES-derived head
   with empirical T_PIPELINE_FILL=60 ns / T_PIPELINE_TAIL=30 ns.
   Max analytic-vs-measured gap across all 7 swept shapes now 2.2 ppt
   (was 9-44 ppt under the old constants).

Paper updates:
- §3 (GEMM): 78%→88% measured at 48 tiles, 23%→15% at 1 tile,
  stage breakdown numbers refreshed (DMA in / Fetch / GEMM all
  ~785 ns at K=3072), analytic-vs-measured agreement tightened
  to "within 2.2 ppt".
- §2.4 (Accuracy): GEMM tracking claim refreshed accordingly.
- §5 (GQA): restore long-ctx 4-cases figures into figures/
  (they were dropped from bench output dir as derived artifacts in
  92b9221 / e45626c but §5 still cites them by name).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 09:56:05 -07:00
mukesh 92b9221533 paper(gqa): drop committed long-ctx 4-cases derived chart PNGs
These 8 prefill/decode 4-case PNGs are derived artifacts regenerated
on demand from scripts/paper/paper_plot_gqa_{prefill,decode}_long_ctx_4cases.py
and no longer belong in the committed bench output.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-17 09:39:26 -07:00
mukesh 694e0cc9b9 paper(gqa): add 6-case per-PE memory + comm summary chart
Analytical plot generator + PNG covering the 4 sharding cases from
slide 17 plus the 2 d_head-TP variants (Cases 4, 5). Three panels:
per-PE HBM budget breakdown (Wq + Wk + Wv + Wo + 4.24 GB KV
headroom), per-PE KV memory at S_kv=1M, and per-PE communication
per output token (decode). Numbers match slide 17 (max KV context
~7.1M for the 64-way sharded cases).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 16:12:26 -07:00
ywkang 6b6e29968a paper: §2 platform deep-edit + §1 GQA framing + figure regen
§2 (KernBench Platform):
- Fix Table 2 HBM aggregate BW (1024 → 2048 GB/s); drop stale
  hbm_total_bw_gbs from topology.yaml (never read by sim_engine)
- Split PE_CPU / PE_SCHED fixed-cost row; disambiguate from the
  40-cycle command-dispatch FIXED term
- §2.2 two-pass: expand to describe Pass 1 timing and Pass 2 data
  data-correctness path
- §2.3 dispatch model: add motivation sentence for the
  descriptor-size linear form
- §2.4 Accuracy: reorder GEMM → All-reduce → Probe →
  Simplifications; drop FSIM aside (already covered by §4 Fig 5
  caption); soften 'every ns' → 'every modeled latency
  contribution'
- §2.5 HW config: add 64 TFLOP/s vs 2048 GB/s (~31 FLOP/byte)
  balance-point intuition and forward pointer to §5 GQA decode
- Fig 1 caption: separate illustrative topology from experimental
  configuration

§1: tighten GQA-as-primary-bandwidth-bottleneck framing.

Figures: regenerate SIP / CUBE architecture (SVG sources + PDF +
generator scripts).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 16:00:23 -07:00
mukesh 77eece81c4 gqa(milestone-1h-gqa): add umbrella bench + first sweep outputs
Single @bench entry that drives the prefill + decode long-context
4-cases sweeps in one invocation, mirroring milestone-1h-gemm. The
individual gqa_helpers/long_ctx/gqa_{prefill,decode}_long_ctx_4cases
modules are now pure helpers (no @bench), reached only via this
umbrella.

Env var contract:
  GQA_1H_RUN=1                    (required gate)
  GQA_1H_SWEEPS=prefill,decode    (default: both; pick subset to skip)
  GQA_1H_TOPOLOGY=topology.yaml   (override)

Output layout:
  benches/1H_milestone_output/gqa/long_ctx/
    sweep_prefill.json
    sweep_decode.json
    gqa_prefill_long_ctx_4cases_{latency,traffic,memory,parallelism}.png
    gqa_decode_long_ctx_4cases_{latency,traffic,memory,parallelism}.png

The decode bench config drops S_kv from 131_072 to 8_192 so the umbrella
finishes in minutes — the comparative-story bars are the same shape at
8K. The 131K production headline number is recoverable by overriding
the dispatch; the helper docstring notes this.

Outputs (2 sweep JSONs + 8 PNGs) ship in this commit alongside the
umbrella that produced them, following the milestone-1h-gemm pattern
where derived artifacts live with the bench that emits them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 13:06:33 -07:00
mukesh 443ede99c7 gqa(prefill-4cases): add long-context prefill 4-cases comparative study
Mirrors the existing decode 4-cases study for prefill on the LLaMA-3.1-70B
single-KV-head group (h_q=8, h_kv=1, d_head=128) across 8 cubes × 8 PEs:

  Case 1  Cube-SP × PE-TP  → KV S_kv-Ring across cubes; Q/O T_q-split 64-way
  Case 2  Cube-Repl × PE-TP → full KV per cube; only CUBE 0's P PEs split T_q
  Case 3  Cube-Repl × PE-SP → full KV per cube; PEs SP on S_kv (intra-cube AR)
  Case 4  Cube-SP × PE-SP  → KV split 64-way + Q T_q-split across cubes
                              (Ring KV + per-cube intra-CUBE AR)  ★ optimal

Cases 2 and 3 use Q-axis tiling (TILE_Q) so the per-PE scratch is bounded
by TILE_Q × TILE_S_KV regardless of T_q (the full Q tensor would be
G·T_q·d_head·2 bytes which scales linearly with T_q and blew the 1 MB
budget at T_q≥128 without tiling).

Per-panel try/except in run_sweep tolerates per-panel failures so
sweep.json always lands with whichever cases succeed plus a failures
list. Case 4 uses configure_sfr_intercube_ring with the snake submesh
(2,4) which installs both the Ring E/W lanes and the intra_* lanes
needed for the intra-CUBE reduce — single SFR config for all 4 cases.

The plot script generates 4 PNGs (latency, traffic, memory, parallelism)
into 1H_milestone_output/gqa/long_ctx/. The parallelism chart shows
total compute work (active_PE × T_q_per_PE × S_kv_processed) — exposes
Case 3's 8× redundancy vs. Cases 1/2/4 which all do unique work.

gqa_prefill_long_ctx_4cases.py exposes run_sweep() rather than a @bench
decorator — the umbrella bench in the next commit invokes it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 13:06:08 -07:00
mukesh e45626c036 gqa: reorganize benches into gqa_helpers/ subpackage; drop legacy headline
Splits the GQA helpers into a dedicated subpackage to make room for the
prefill 4-cases study (next commit) and a single umbrella bench
(milestone-1h-gqa, after that).

Layout:
  benches/gqa_helpers/
    long_ctx/    — decode 4-cases kernels + sweep runner
    short_ctx/   — prefill/decode short-context kernels
    shared/      — _gqa_panel_helpers + decode_opt2 (context-agnostic)

The registry audit now skips subpackages so gqa_helpers/ (without a
leading underscore) doesn't get audited for @bench decorators.

Also drops the legacy milestone-gqa-headline bench, its
_gqa_attention_prefill_long kernel, 6 dependent prefill tests, the
paper_gqa_latency.py report harness, and the 3 stale headline-derived
PNGs the §6 wire-up referenced (paper will re-pull from the new
1H_milestone_output/gqa/long_ctx/ once §6 is updated).

The _ccl_cfg and _summarize_op_log helpers used to live in the
headline bench; extracted them to gqa_helpers/shared/_gqa_panel_helpers.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 13:05:41 -07:00
ywkang 359a0eaa44 paper(platform): Table 1 -> table*, shrink Fig 1 row 1, move Fig 1/2 source up
- Probe table (Table 1, tab:probe-pe-dma) promoted to table* so it
  spans both columns and no longer gets clipped at the column edge.
- Fig 1 (hw-arch) row 1 (SIP, CUBE subfigures) trimmed: widths
  0.495 -> 0.42 textwidth and a height=0.6\linewidth cap added so
  the figure occupies less vertical space and floats can land
  earlier in the document.
- Fig 1 and Fig 2 source blocks relocated to the top of §2 so they
  enter LaTeX's float queue before any §2 body text. As a result
  Fig 1 now lands on page 3 and Fig 2 on page 4 (was 4 and 5).
- Table 2 (tab:hw, modeled hardware config) reverted to plain
  \begin{table}; the previous \begin{table*} reshape was not
  requested.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 11:58:48 -07:00
ywkang 1cf8dd7868 paper(platform): widen SIP/CUBE subfigures, drop height cap
- subfig widths 0.46 -> 0.495 textwidth so the \hfill gap between
  (a) SIP and (b) CUBE shrinks to ~2% textwidth instead of ~8%.
- Removed the height=0.85\linewidth cap on both subfigures; with the
  cap, the (roughly 1:1) SIP and CUBE diagrams were being scaled
  down to 85% even when the column had room. Let them render at
  their natural aspect ratio.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-16 11:22:01 -07:00