23992548f7
Three coupled fixes that recover small-tile GEMM pipeline efficiency from 53% to 88% (32x3072x32 load_ref, composite_window basis). 1. PE_DMA channel-hold (ADR-0014 D4 clarified): both the _handle_with_hooks (PeInternalTxn) and _pipeline_process (TileToken) paths used to hold the cap=1 DMA channel through the full HBM round-trip, which double-serialized with the HBM_CTRL's own per-PC `available_at` model and prevented back-to-back tile DMAs from amortizing their per-request head latency. Channel is now released after the request is enqueued onto the next hop; HBM serialization is HBM_CTRL's responsibility alone. Tests: new test_pe_dma_back_to_back_pipelining as the oracle (asserts wall < 75% of strict-serialized N x single_op). Existing test_pe_dma_record_start_after_channel_acquire rewritten to assert t_start clustering (channel released fast) instead of the old round-trip-hold invariant. test_pe_dma_same_channel_serializes still passes — HBM_CTRL preserves ordering. Probe regression: PE→local-HBM 32 KiB stays at 141 ns (single-request, unaffected). 2. milestone_1h_gemm bench: matmul_composite was reading MATMUL_M/K/N env vars at module load, so every sweep row replayed the cached 256³ result; values now read inside run(). Drops the stale sys.modules deletion hack. 3. Analytic ideal-pipeline model: dropped the (n_mn-1)·dma_w_per_pair penalty (over-pessimistic for under-tile shapes — it pushed measured > theoretical) and replaced the D_STAGES-derived head with empirical T_PIPELINE_FILL=60 ns / T_PIPELINE_TAIL=30 ns. Max analytic-vs-measured gap across all 7 swept shapes now 2.2 ppt (was 9-44 ppt under the old constants). Paper updates: - §3 (GEMM): 78%→88% measured at 48 tiles, 23%→15% at 1 tile, stage breakdown numbers refreshed (DMA in / Fetch / GEMM all ~785 ns at K=3072), analytic-vs-measured agreement tightened to "within 2.2 ppt". - §2.4 (Accuracy): GEMM tracking claim refreshed accordingly. - §5 (GQA): restore long-ctx 4-cases figures into figures/ (they were dropped from bench output dir as derived artifacts in92b9221/e45626cbut §5 still cites them by name). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>