ADR-0064 Revision 2 second-pass review fixes:
- D7 added 1024-byte cap rationale: explicitly framed as a *safe
engineering limit* (intentionally above all known composites at ~322
bytes, finite descriptor capacity placeholder), not a measured HW
number. Default is the discipline; topology override for real HW.
- D7 segment ordering: strict FIFO is the *ordering source*; rw_handles
is dependency metadata, not the ordering primitive. Explicit note for
the future RW-aware reorder migration path.
- Tests rewritten around the formula (D1) instead of specific numbers:
- Test #1 → "formula preservation" (parametrized across composites,
asserts dispatch == FIXED + bytes × R, not anchor 43 ns).
- Test #2 → robust "opt3 > 2 × opt2" qualitative gate; ≈ 4.0× is
informative only, not the gate, so calibration changes don't break.
- Test #9 → qualitative (opt2 < opt3 at all R), not a numeric ratio.
- Anchor description in D3 stays as *informative* (shows the model
produces ≈ 43 ns at defaults), but is no longer a test gate.
ADR-0065 second-pass review:
- D5 step 5 aligned with D6.6 invariant: explicit conflict check before
auto-binding (previously written as if auto-bind always happens).
Mirrors D6.6 wording: error if both kernel explicit `a` and prologue
primary_out are present.
- Test #7 made robust: `opt3 > 2 × opt2` gate (was ≈ 4.0×).
Default-calibration model expectation (≈ 4.0×) recorded as informative
reference, not the gate.
DDD-0065 follow-on robust thresholds:
- §1.4 success criteria: ratio condition rewritten as `opt3 > 2 × opt2`
with model-expected ≈ 4.0× as informative.
- §9 P6 phase gate: `opt3 > 2 × opt2` (was 4.0× ± 15%).
- §10 dispatch ratio test: assert `opt3 > 2 × opt2`; record observed
ratio for performance tracking but do not gate on it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
ywkang
3647e2d8f5