Files
kernbench2/tests
mukesh b7c4c680aa analytical-viz: roofline tab — 'How hyperscalers pick GPU count' section
New section at the bottom of the Chip Roofline tab implementing the
three-axis GPU count decision:

  N_GPUs = max(capacity_floor, KV_headroom, throughput_SLO) × N_replicas

Interactive inputs: concurrent users, avg context/user, TPOT SLO.
Four KPI cards report each axis + the recommended total, with a
'binds:' delta chip showing which axis is the bottleneck.

  - Axis A (capacity):  PEs to hold weights alone
  - Axis B (KV):        PEs to hold weights + all KV of one replica's users
  - Axis C (throughput): replicas needed at B_at_SLO users each
  - Total: max(A,B) × N_replicas

Contextual caption explains what to do about the binding axis. If SLO
is infeasible (even B=1 exceeds SLO), an error block explains the
options (loosen SLO, shorten context, or scale up FLOPs/BW knobs).

Plus three collapsed expanders explaining the hybrid deployment
pattern hyperscalers use:
  - Layer 1: one elastic pool + PagedAttention + continuous batching
  - Layer 2: length-tier routing (standard vs long-context)
  - Layer 3: disaggregated prefill/decode (DistServe, Splitwise)

Pure additions in chip_roofline.py:
- max_batch_within_slo(machine, model, s_kv, slo_s) — analytical
  inverse of step_latency to find the largest per-replica B under SLO
- size_deployment(machine, model, n_users, avg_ctx, slo_s) — returns
  GpuSizingResult with all three axes + binding info

6 new tests cover: capacity scales with model size, KV grows with
users/context, binding axis flips with workload shape, tight SLO
shrinks max batch, weight-time-exceeds-SLO returns 0, total ==
per-replica × replicas.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 15:07:20 -07:00
..