ywkang
dd525bfcb7
New `/paper` slash-command skill that synthesizes ADR/SPEC content and live KernBench benchmark results into a sectioned LaTeX technical paper compiled to PDF with Tectonic (auto-installed). The skill negotiates a TOC, grounds every number in committed artifacts or fresh bench runs, and keeps report-only benches isolated. This commit also includes the first generated report: - docs/report/1H-codesign-paper/ — main.tex + per-section .tex, figures, toc.md contract, and the built 8-page main.pdf. Covers the platform (source-level kernels, latency model + accuracy, HW config from topology.yaml), GEMM via composite command, All-Reduce via PE_IPCQ, and fused GQA combining both, plus discussion/conclusion/2H future work. - scripts/paper/ — isolated report harnesses (not registered benches): paper_gqa_latency.py harvests per-panel GQA end-to-end latency + engine occupancy (the milestone only emitted op-counts); paper_plot_gqa.py renders the GQA figures. GEMM/All-Reduce reuse committed milestone figures/CSVs; GQA results are generated fresh. Honest flags retained: PE_CPU dispatch cost is 0 in this config, and the proposed two-composite softmax_merge decode is marked designed-not-measured. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
52 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
52 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
\section{Discussion: which hardware changes are meaningful}
|
|
\label{sec:discussion}
|
|
|
|
Read together, the three studies point to a consistent ranking of where
|
|
hardware investment pays off for attention-centric decoding.
|
|
|
|
\paragraph{The composite command is foundational, but indirectly.} Its
|
|
direct effect---driving compute-rich GEMMs to
|
|
\textasciitilde\SI{78}{\percent} of peak---matters most for the
|
|
compute-bound parts of a model (the large feed-forward and projection
|
|
matrices). For attention itself, its more important effect is
|
|
\emph{diagnostic}: by making issue and compute nearly free, it removes the
|
|
overhead that would otherwise mask the true bottleneck, and the fused GQA
|
|
results then show unambiguously that the kernel is data-movement bound.
|
|
Without a cheap, self-routing issue mechanism we would not be able to tell
|
|
whether attention is slow because of compute or because of data movement;
|
|
with it, the answer is clear.
|
|
|
|
\paragraph{The communication path is where attention latency actually
|
|
lives.} Every all-reduce and fused-GQA measurement says the same thing:
|
|
the limiting resource is moving and reducing data, not multiplying it. That
|
|
makes the PE\_IPCQ design and the choices around it the highest-value
|
|
hardware levers for this workload:
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item \textbf{On-device collectives with a compute/communication
|
|
virtual-channel split.} Performing the reduction on the device, with
|
|
\texttt{vc\_comm} separated from \texttt{vc\_compute} so the reduction
|
|
does not stall the compute DMA, is what lets attention overlap KV
|
|
movement with score computation at all.
|
|
\item \textbf{Fast on-PE staging memory.} Keeping the IPCQ buffer in TCM
|
|
rather than HBM or SRAM is worth \SI{14}{}--\SI{38}{\percent} of
|
|
collective latency at large payloads---a pure placement decision with a
|
|
first-order effect.
|
|
\item \textbf{Wrap-around (torus) inter-device links.} A torus fabric
|
|
buys \SI{20}{}--\SI{25}{\percent} over a mesh or ring at scale by
|
|
shortening the worst-case reduction path.
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\paragraph{Raw MAC throughput is not the constraint for attention.} The
|
|
GQA panels leave the GEMM and vector-math engines two to three orders of
|
|
magnitude below the DMA engine in busy time. Adding MAC area would not move
|
|
decode latency; the workload cannot use it. This is the single most
|
|
actionable finding for an attention-dominated roadmap.
|
|
|
|
\paragraph{Caveats.} These conclusions are achievable-kernel results from a
|
|
deterministic model, not E2E measurements; absolute numbers carry the
|
|
model's idealizations (\S\ref{sec:latency}), though the relative rankings
|
|
that drive the recommendations are robust to them. The headline GQA panels
|
|
are also at modest scale (up to four users, single SIP), and one designed
|
|
refinement---the two-composite \textsf{softmax\_merge} decode---is not yet
|
|
in the measured path. Larger-scale and multi-SIP headline runs are 2H work.
|