55c20bd1a637731fb2e45aa19c80943c41a7aa1f
Consumes auto_hardware.joint_explore(). UI:
- Sweep-depth radio: two_stage / balanced (default) / coarse
- Run joint sweep button + spinner
- 4 metric cards: HW candidates, feasible joint, Pareto count,
best latency
- Panel 1 (Pareto scatter): latency vs hardware cost proxy, feasible
in grey, Pareto colored by PE count, dashed line connects Pareto in
cost order — this is the "optimal HW config for the model" plot
- Panel 2 (sensitivity bar chart): per-knob relative speedup when
doubled from the baseline. Green bars, sorted biggest first;
annotated with the baseline → doubled values. Answers "where to
invest next?"
- Panel 3 (table): sortable Pareto joint configs with parallelism +
HW spec columns (PE HBM, HBM BW, TFLOPs, PE↔PE, D2D, C2C)
- Load into sidebar: picks a Pareto row and syncs both the HW
selectboxes (Per-PE + Interconnect sub-tabs) AND the parallelism
sliders. Values only get loaded when the target is one of the
selectbox options; otherwise the sidebar keeps its current value.
Session-state cache under _hw_result keyed by (model, s_kv, mode, depth);
if any of these drift, a warning suggests refreshing.
Verified: app.py parses; auto_hardware smoke run on Llama 70B decode
128K in ~20s produces sensible HW co-design signal (HBM BW 33% speedup,
everything else <1.5%).
Next: verification across Qwen 3 8B, Mixtral 8x7B (Commit 6).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
kernbench
A discrete-event simulator for AI accelerator hardware, built on SimPy. It models the full data path — from host PCIe injection through IO chiplet, NOC mesh, crossbar, and HBM — to measure end-to-end latency with contention and queueing.
Architecture
Host (CLI)
|
+-- kernbench run -> run a benchmark (QKV GEMM, AllReduce, ...)
+-- kernbench probe -> latency/BW analysis for predefined traffic patterns
|
v
+---------------------------------------------------+
| Runtime API (runtime_api/) |
| MemoryWriteMsg, MemoryReadMsg, PeDmaMsg, |
| KernelLaunchMsg |
+---------------------------------------------------+
| Simulation Engine (sim_engine/) |
| SimPy processes, wire model, BW occupancy |
+---------------------------------------------------+
| Components (components/) |
| pcie_ep, io_cpu, m_cpu, noc, xbar, hbm_ctrl, |
| pe_cpu, pe_dma, pe_gemm, pe_math, pe_tcm, ... |
+---------------------------------------------------+
| Topology (topology/) |
| YAML-driven graph: 4x4 cube mesh, UCIe links, |
| IO chiplet with NOC, HBM slices |
+---------------------------------------------------+
Prerequisites
- Python 3.10+
- Dependencies:
simpy,pyyaml,pytest
Installation
# Create virtual environment
python -m venv .venv
# Activate (Windows)
.venv\Scripts\activate
# Activate (Linux/macOS)
source .venv/bin/activate
# Install in editable mode
pip install -e ".[dev]"
Usage
Probe — Latency and Bandwidth Analysis
The probe command runs predefined traffic patterns (H2D write, D2H read,
PE DMA) and reports latency breakdown, bottleneck bandwidth, and utilization.
# Run all probe cases
kernbench probe --topology topology.yaml
# Run a specific case
kernbench probe --topology topology.yaml --case pe-local-hbm
Output includes:
- Summary tables — actual latency, overhead/drain/wire breakdown, effective BW, utilization
- BW saturation sweep — utilization at 4KB through 1MB to show saturation threshold
- Per-hop route traces — cumulative timestamps at every node along the path
Run — Execute a Benchmark
# Run a benchmark on all devices
kernbench run --topology topology.yaml --bench qkv_gemm
# Run on a specific device
kernbench run --topology topology.yaml --bench qkv_gemm --device sip:0
Available benchmarks (in benches/):
qkv_gemm— single-PE QKV GEMMqkv_gemm_multi_pe— multi-PE QKV GEMMipcq_allreduce— IPCQ AllReduce
Tests
# Run all tests (278 tests)
pytest
# Run a specific test file
pytest tests/test_probe.py -v
# Run a single test
pytest tests/test_probe.py::test_h2d_latency_monotonic -v
# Run with output shown
pytest -s tests/test_probe.py
Key test files:
| File | Coverage |
|---|---|
test_probe.py |
Probe latency invariants, monotonicity, determinism, BW sweep |
test_engine.py |
SimPy engine: submit/wait/complete, routing, multi-SIP |
test_bw_occupancy.py |
Wire BW contention, HOL blocking, back-to-back serialization |
test_iochiplet_noc_d2h.py |
IO chiplet NOC topology, H2D/D2H data paths |
test_noc_mesh.py |
2D mesh NOC routing, Manhattan distance |
test_pe_components.py |
PE-internal components: cpu, scheduler, dma, gemm |
test_routing.py |
XY routing, address resolution, path finding |
test_topology_compile.py |
YAML topology compilation, node/edge validation |
Topology Configuration
The system is configured via topology.yaml. Key parameters:
| Parameter | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
ns_per_mm |
0.01 | Wire propagation delay (10 ps/mm) |
cube_mesh |
4x4 | Cube grid dimensions per SIP |
ucie.overhead_ns |
8.0 | UCIe protocol overhead per port (16ns per crossing) |
hbm_ctrl.efficiency |
0.8 | HBM effective BW factor (256 to 204.8 GB/s) |
xbar.overhead_ns |
2.0 | Crossbar arbitration delay |
xbar_to_hbm_bw_gbs |
256.0 | Raw HBM bandwidth per slice |
Project Structure
kernbench/
+-- src/kernbench/
| +-- cli/ # CLI entry points (main, probe, report)
| +-- common/ # Shared types (Completion, RequestHandle, Trace)
| +-- components/ # Hardware component models (SimPy processes)
| +-- di/ # Dependency injection
| +-- policy/ # Routing (XY), address decoding (PhysAddr)
| +-- runtime_api/ # Host-facing API (messages, bench runner)
| +-- sim_engine/ # Discrete-event engine, transaction, wire model
| +-- topology/ # YAML builder, mesh generator, graph types
| +-- triton_emu/ # Triton kernel emulation
+-- benches/ # Benchmark implementations
+-- tests/ # pytest test suite (278 tests)
+-- docs/ # ADRs, latency model docs, diagrams
+-- topology.yaml # System topology configuration
+-- CHANGES.md # Changelog
Documentation
- CHANGES.md — changelog with detailed descriptions of each release
- docs/onboarding/latency-model.md — latency model explanation with worked examples
- docs/onboarding/ — onboarding guides (architecture overview, latency model, CCL author guide, intro presentation)
- docs/adr/ — Architecture Decision Records
Description
Languages
Python
97.6%
HTML
2.4%