Files
kernbench2/docs/adr/ADR-0024-par-sip-tp-launcher.md
T
ywkang 687c98086d ADR housekeeping: category prefixes, lifecycle folders, retroactive 0034-0037
Filename + lifecycle:
- ADR rename to ADR-NNNN-<cat>-title.md with 8 3-letter category prefixes
  (dev / mem / lat / prog / algo / par / api / ver). Numbers stay immutable.
- ADR Lifecycle split into 3 folders, documented in CLAUDE.md Part 2:
  docs/adr/ (Accepted), docs/adr-proposed/ (Proposed/Stub/Draft),
  docs/adr-history/ (Superseded/Merged). Status field gains "Draft" for
  retroactive docs pending verification.

Merges (one ADR per topic, no change-history annotations):
- ADR-0017 absorbs ADR-0019 (Cube NOC + per-PE HBM connectivity, 10 D-items)
- ADR-0014 absorbs ADR-0021 (PE pipeline execution model, 8 D-items incl.
  TileToken self-routing and multi-op composite epilogue scope)
- ADR-0023 absorbs docs/ipcq-dma-codesign-hw.md as new "HW Realization
  Notes (Informative)" section (D16-D23 + Open HW Questions). codesign-hw.md
  deleted; ADR-0019/0021 moved to adr-history with one-line stub status

Retroactive documentation (G4 closures, code-verified):
- ADR-0037 forwarding component (TransitComponent: first-flit overhead,
  serial worker, path-based routing, single impl/multiple names)
- ADR-0036 IO_CPU component (target_start_ns global barrier stamping,
  per-cube fan-out, response aggregation)
- ADR-0035 M_CPU & M_CPU.DMA component (3 fan-out paths, DMA Resources,
  target_start_ns passthrough)
- ADR-0034 HBM controller internal design (per-PC state, address-based
  selection, flit-aware per-flit commit, async finalize, command-only
  fallback path)

Content updates:
- ADR-0010 expanded to full CLI surface (run/probe/web), retitled
  "Command Line Interface and Execution Semantics"
- ADR-0007 D2 rewritten to current state; ADR-0015 supersession notes pruned
- ADR-0005 wrapped in Decision header with D1-D5; ADR-0022 metadata
  block replaced with standard Status header
- ADR-0024 trimmed to rank=SIP launcher essentials (D1-D4);
  ADR-0027 cleaned of supersession history
- ADR-0033 D6 cleanup: address-based PC selection moved out of future-work
  (now documented in ADR-0034 D3); related D1/D3 wording realigned
- Cross-references back-filled in 5 ADRs (G3 gaps closed)

Onboarding docs split:
- docs/onboarding/ created
- moved: hw-architecture-overview.md, latency-model.md, di-presentation.md,
  ccl-author-guide{,.en}.md
- references updated in README, ADR-0023{,.en}, src/kernbench/ccl/__init__.py

Source / test / yaml: ADR-NNNN cross-references in docstrings and YAML
comments updated after the merges (ADR-0021->0014 D6, ADR-0019->0017 D8).
No behavior change.

Tooling:
- tools/verify_adr_lang_pairs.py + tests/test_verify_adr_lang_pairs.py
  (ADR EN/KO pair invariant checker)
- .claude/commands/report.md tracked (/report slash command)
- .gitignore: allow .claude/commands/*.md while keeping settings files ignored

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 01:15:55 -07:00

207 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown

# ADR-0024: SIP-level Launcher — rank = SIP
## Status
Accepted
## Context
### 목표
`torch.distributed` collective 호출의 참여 단위(rank)를 **SIP**(device)
경계에 맞춘다. 실제 PyTorch DDP/TP 스크립트와 **호스트 레벨에서 구분 없이**
읽히는 bench 코드를 목표로 한다.
real PyTorch와 비교:
| 차원 | real PyTorch | KernBench |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 프로세스 모델 | N개 프로세스, 각 1 GPU | 1 프로세스, N greenlet, 각 1 SIP |
| `get_rank()` | `RANK` env var | greenlet-local 레지스트리 |
| `get_world_size()` | `WORLD_SIZE` env var | topology의 SIP 수 |
| `torch.cuda.set_device(r)` (real) / `torch.ahbm.set_device(r)` (KernBench) | rank → GPU | rank → SIP |
| `mp.spawn` | OS 프로세스 fork | greenlet fan-out |
### 풀어야 할 문제
1. **공개 API에서 rank = SIP** — bench worker가 PE 개념을 알지 않도록.
2. **Greenlet-local rank/device tracking** — 1-프로세스 모델 안에서 각
worker greenlet이 자기 rank / 자기 SIP를 정확히 식별.
3. **Tensor placement = structural (sip, cube, pe)** — rank가 SIP이면
기본 텐서 배치도 구조적 좌표로 표현되어야 함.
### Non-problem (이 ADR 밖)
- IPCQ direction addressing → ADR-0025
- `DPPolicy.sip`/`num_sips` 제거 → ADR-0026
- Megatron-style TP → ADR-0027
- DTensor → ADR-0028 (future)
- Worker scheduling / `mp.spawn` / collective drain / exception cleanup
→ ADR-0027 D0/D1
- Collective algorithm 구현 (intercube_allreduce, SFR config) → ADR-0032
## Decision
### D1. rank = SIP (world_size 해석)
```python
def _resolve_world_size(self) -> int:
if "world_size" in self._merged:
return int(self._merged["world_size"])
defaults = self._cfg_all.get("defaults", {})
if "world_size" in defaults:
return int(defaults["world_size"])
spec = self.ctx.spec or {}
return int(spec.get("system", {}).get("sips", {}).get("count", 1))
```
우선순위: 알고리즘 override > defaults override > SIP count. `ccl.yaml`
override는 legacy "rank = PE" 테스트 경로로 유지.
### D2. Greenlet-local rank registry (+ debug warning)
```python
class DistributedContext:
def __init__(self):
self._backend = None
self._rank_by_greenlet: dict = {}
def _bind_rank(self, g, rank: int) -> None:
self._rank_by_greenlet[g] = int(rank)
def get_rank(self) -> int:
self._ensure_initialized()
from greenlet import getcurrent
g = getcurrent()
if g not in self._rank_by_greenlet:
if os.environ.get("KERNBENCH_DEBUG"):
warnings.warn(
"get_rank() called outside a bound greenlet — returning 0. "
"Likely a bug unless running single-driver."
)
return 0
return int(self._rank_by_greenlet[g])
```
### D3. `torch.ahbm.set_device(rank)` — SIP 바인딩
KernBench 백엔드 이름은 `ahbm` (ADR-0023). Real PyTorch는
`torch.cuda.set_device(r)`이지만 우리는 CUDA가 아니므로 honestly-named
namespace를 사용한다.
```python
class _AhbmNamespace:
"""torch.ahbm — per-greenlet SIP device binding.
Real-PyTorch parity idiom: ``torch.cuda.set_device(rank)``. Since
KernBench's backend is 'ahbm' (not CUDA), we expose the equivalent
API under ``torch.ahbm`` to avoid pretending to be a CUDA runtime.
"""
def __init__(self):
self._device_by_greenlet: dict = {}
def set_device(self, device: int) -> None:
from greenlet import getcurrent
self._device_by_greenlet[getcurrent()] = int(device)
def current_device(self) -> int | None:
from greenlet import getcurrent
return self._device_by_greenlet.get(getcurrent())
# Attached to RuntimeContext as `self.ahbm = _AhbmNamespace()`.
# Bench code: `torch.ahbm.set_device(rank)` mirrors `torch.cuda.set_device`.
```
**PyTorch 2.x style 병행 지원**: 최신 PyTorch는 device-agnostic한
`torch.accelerator` 네임스페이스를 지향 (`torch.accelerator.set_device_index(r)`,
`torch.accelerator.current_device_index()`). Device vendor에 종속되지 않는
코드를 쓰려는 사용자를 위해 KernBench도 이 표면을 병행 지원한다.
```python
class _AcceleratorNamespace:
"""torch.accelerator — device-agnostic API (PyTorch 2.x style).
Aliases torch.ahbm for bench code that prefers device-neutral idiom:
torch.accelerator.set_device_index(rank)
torch.accelerator.current_device_index()
"""
def __init__(self, ahbm: _AhbmNamespace):
self._ahbm = ahbm
def set_device_index(self, device: int) -> None:
self._ahbm.set_device(device)
def current_device_index(self) -> int | None:
return self._ahbm.current_device()
# RuntimeContext
self.ahbm = _AhbmNamespace()
self.accelerator = _AcceleratorNamespace(self.ahbm) # alias
```
Bench 작성자는 다음 중 하나를 선택 — 둘 다 내부적으로 같은 레지스트리를 보유:
```python
torch.ahbm.set_device(rank) # KernBench-native, explicit backend
torch.accelerator.set_device_index(rank) # PyTorch 2.x device-agnostic
```
### D4. Tensor placement = structural (sip, cube, pe) 좌표
`resolve_dp_policy``target_sip`을 직접 받아 구조적 좌표로 placement 생성.
세부는 ADR-0026.
```python
# RuntimeContext._create_tensor
current_sip = self.ahbm.current_device() # (D3 naming)
if current_sip is None:
current_sip = 0 # single-driver fallback (D2와 일관)
placement = resolve_dp_policy(
dp, shape=shape_2d, itemsize=itemsize,
num_pe=eff_num_pe, num_cubes=eff_num_cubes,
target_sip=current_sip,
)
```
Post-hoc `pe_index` shifting 없음 — ShardSpec이 `(sip, cube, pe)` 구조적
좌표를 직접 보유. ShardSpec 상세는 ADR-0026.
---
## Dependencies
- **ADR-0023** (IPCQ): backend `ahbm` namespace의 기원.
- **ADR-0026** (DPPolicy intra-device): D4의 `resolve_dp_policy` 시그니처와
ShardSpec의 구조적 좌표 표현.
- **ADR-0027** (Megatron TP + scheduler): worker scheduling, `mp.spawn`,
collective drain, exception cleanup의 구현 기준.
---
## Non-goals
- **IPCQ protocol 수정**: ADR-0023 유지.
- **DPPolicy 필드 정리**: ADR-0026.
- **Megatron-style TP**: ADR-0027.
- **Worker scheduling / spawn / drain / exception cleanup**: ADR-0027 D0/D1.
- **Collective algorithm 구현**: ADR-0032.
- **Multi-node (프로세스 간)**: 단일 프로세스.
---
## Consequences
### Positive
- **Bench = real PyTorch DDP** (공개 API 관점).
- **Greenlet-local rank**: 1-프로세스 모델에서 cross-rank correctness 가능.
- **Structural placement 좌표**: ADR-0026 / ADR-0027 / ADR-0032의 다른 ADR이
`(sip, cube, pe)` 3튜플 위에서 일관되게 동작.
### Neutral
- IPCQ PE-level protocol (ADR-0023) 불변.
- IO_CPU 역할 불변 (기존 transit 그대로).