Verified against sim_engine data path (memory_store, data_executor): - GQA reuse does NOT need a broadcast op. The baseline's h_q==h_kv limit is its head-packing reshape hack, not a missing primitive. Correct fix: per-KV-head loop with G folded into matmul M dim (byte-conserving reshape) — runs today, timing correct (m=G*T_q), data mode runs. - ADR-0061 broadcast demoted from 'the blocker' to optional convenience. - Surfaced tl.trans = reshape-not-transpose (memory_store reshapes; data_executor np.matmul on reshaped operands) -> numeric parity is bounded; verification is structural/timing/determinism-first (matches SPEC perf-model purpose). Optional tl.transpose deferred. - Reordered DDD phase plan (P1 GQA needs no new feature; P3 scratch_scope is the key scale feature); added open decisions 10.10 (transpose) and 10.11 (GQA-via-M-fold finding). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.2 KiB
ADR-0061: tl.broadcast / tl.repeat — data-faithful GQA head reuse
Status
Proposed
Supporting ADR for ADR-0060 (AHBM GQA Fused Attention).
⚠ Re-evaluated during design iteration — this is now OPTIONAL, not a GQA blocker. The original framing (below) held that GQA
h_q > h_kvis blocked by the MemoryStore byte-conservation check on a broadcast view. That is true only of the baseline's head-packing hack (_view(K, (h_q·d, S_kv))). The correct GQA design (ADR-0060 §5.2) processes one KV head at a time and folds theGgroup rows into the matmul M dimension — using only byte-conserving reshapes — so it needs no broadcast op at all, andnp.matmulalready broadcasts a shared operand in Phase-2 data mode. This ADR therefore drops to a convenience primitive: it cleans up additive-mask construction across theG·T_qrows and serves general kernels. Lowest priority of the three supporting ADRs. The rest of this document is retained as the design for that convenience op.
Context
The GQA reuse lever
Grouped-Query Attention amortises K/V loads: G = H_q / H_kv query heads
share one KV head. For Llama3-70B G = 8. In a kernel this means a KV
tile of shape [S_kv, d] (for one KV head) must be matmul'd against the
G query rows of its group. Loading K/V once and reusing it across
the group is the decode-time efficiency win (ADR-0060 §5.2).
Why it does not work today
The existing mesh kernels reshape tensors with a metadata-only helper
_view (src/kernbench/benches/_attention_mesh_kv.py:25-36,
_attention_mesh_mlo.py:25-36):
def _view(handle, new_shape):
return TensorHandle(..., shape=new_shape, nbytes=handle.nbytes, ...)
# ^^^ new shape ^^^ OLD nbytes (unchanged)
This rewrites shape but keeps the original nbytes. It is purely
symbolic. It survives Phase 1 (timing) because Phase 1 never reads
tensor bytes. It fails Phase 2 (enable_data=True) because the
data executor materialises every op through MemoryStore.read, which
enforces byte conservation
(src/kernbench/sim_engine/memory_store.py:67-73):
if shape is not None and arr.shape != shape:
if arr.nbytes != np.prod(shape) * arr.dtype.itemsize:
raise ValueError(f"Shape mismatch: stored {arr.shape} ({arr.nbytes}B) "
f"vs requested {shape} ({...}B)")
arr = arr.reshape(shape)
A reshape conserves bytes; a broadcast does not ([S_kv, 1, d] →
[S_kv, G, d] multiplies the element count by G). So the moment a
kernel tries to view a h_kv-headed K as if it had h_q heads, the
stored array has 1/G of the requested bytes and read raises.
The current test suite documents this as a deliberate limitation
(tests/attention/test_milestone_gqa_llama70b.py:137-142):
"v1 uses
h_q == h_kv == 1to avoid … GQA broadcast view (which is symbolic and does not survive MemoryStore's nbytes check under simulator data execution). Real GQA (h_q > h_kv) is deferred."
There is no broadcast / repeat / expand primitive in the tl API
today (src/kernbench/triton_emu/tl_context.py exposes trans,
zeros, full, arange as metadata-only ops; none replicate data).
Decision
Add a data-faithful broadcast op to the tl API and the data
executor. Unlike _view, it updates nbytes and, in Phase 2, actually
replicates the underlying ndarray. The latency it charges models the
on-chip register/SRAM fan-out, not an HBM re-load (the KV tile is read
from HBM once; broadcast is an on-chip replication).
D1. tl surface
def broadcast(self, x: TensorHandle, new_shape: tuple[int, ...]) -> TensorHandle:
"""Replicate x along size-1 axes to new_shape (numpy broadcast rules).
new_shape must be broadcast-compatible with x.shape: every axis is
either equal to x's, or x's is 1 (the axis being expanded). nbytes of
the result reflect new_shape (unlike the metadata-only _view).
"""
tl.repeat(x, axis, n) is offered as a thin convenience wrapper over
broadcast for the common "insert a group axis and expand it to G"
pattern, but broadcast is the primitive.
D2. Command + op_log
Emit a new BroadcastCmd (sibling of MathCmd):
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class BroadcastCmd:
src: TensorHandle
out: TensorHandle # out.nbytes reflects new_shape
new_shape: tuple[int, ...]
data_op: bool = True
op_log entry: op_kind="math", op_name="broadcast" (it runs on the
MATH/vector engine, like the other element-wise ops). The output handle
is allocated from PE scratch via the existing _make_compute_out
(tl_context.py:148-156), so out.nbytes is computed from new_shape
and the byte-conservation check passes in Phase 2.
D3. Phase 2 data execution
Add _execute_broadcast to the data executor
(src/kernbench/sim_engine/data_executor.py):
def _execute_broadcast(self, op):
p = op.params
src = self._resolve_read(p["src_space"], p["src_addr"],
p["src_shape"], p["dtype"], op.t_start)
result = np.broadcast_to(src, p["new_shape"]).copy() # .copy() → writable, owns bytes
self.store.write(p["dst_space"], p["dst_addr"], result)
.copy() is required: np.broadcast_to returns a zero-stride view, and
MemoryStore stores references — a later consumer's nbytes check must see
a real prod(new_shape)-element array.
D4. Latency model
Broadcast latency = vector-engine cost of writing prod(new_shape)
elements (reuse pe_math._compute_ns(num_elements),
src/kernbench/components/builtin/pe_math.py:46-51). This models the
on-chip replication into the register file / SRAM that real GQA hardware
performs. It is not an HBM transaction — no dma_read is logged,
consistent with "K/V tile loaded once" (ADR-0060 §5.2).
Alternatives
A1. Indexed per-head dot (no broadcast op)
Loop the G query heads, each doing its own tl.dot(Q_g, Kᵀ) against
the same (re-ref'd, not re-loaded) KV tile:
for g in range(G):
s_g = tl.dot(Q[g], K_T) # G separate GEMMs, KV reused via tl.ref
- Pro: no new primitive; works in Phase 2 today.
- Con:
G×more GEMM commands (op_log inflation), no batched-GEMM modelling, and the per-call overhead is chargedGtimes. It also obscures the "single batched matmul over the group" the hardware does. Rejected as the primary path; acceptable as a fallback if the batched 2D dot's shape handling proves awkward.
A2. Keep _view, relax the nbytes check
Make MemoryStore.read tolerate broadcast (stride-0) shapes. Rejected:
it silently breaks byte conservation for all readers and would mask
genuine shape bugs elsewhere. The check is a correctness invariant
(ADR-0052), not an obstacle to route around.
A3. Materialise the broadcast at deploy time
Store K/V already expanded to h_q heads in HBM. Rejected: defeats the
entire point of GQA (it G×'s KV-cache HBM footprint and bandwidth).
Consequences
Positive
- Unblocks real GQA (
h_q > h_kv) in Phase 2 — the headline blocker for ADR-0060 and the deferred milestone work. - A general, reusable primitive (any kernel needing numpy-style broadcast benefits, not just attention).
- Byte conservation stays intact; no weakening of MemoryStore.
Negative
- One new command type + one data-executor handler + one
tlmethod. - Phase 2
.copy()allocates the expanded array in the store; for very large groups this is real memory. Bounded by tile size in the tiled design (ADR-0060), so acceptable.
Test Requirements
- Phase 1 timing:
tl.broadcast([S,1,d] → [S,G,d])logs onemath/broadcastop withnum_elements == S*G*d; nodma_read. - Phase 2 data: broadcasting a known array yields the numpy
broadcast_to(...).copy()result; a downstreamtl.dotconsuming it passes the MemoryStore nbytes check (the exact case that fails today). - GQA end-to-end: re-run a reduced
milestone-gqa-llama70bpanel withh_q=8, h_kv=1underenable_data=True; it must complete (today it raisesValueError: Shape mismatch). - Broadcast-incompatible shape (e.g. axis size 3 → 8) raises a clear error at emit time, not deep in Phase 2.