kernbench2/docs/adr-ko/ADR-0015-dev-component-port-wire-model.md

# ADR-0015: Component Port/Wire Model and Fabric Routing

## Status

Accepted

## Context

Realistic hardware modeling — queues, contention, fan-out — requires
that components own fabric traversal while the simulation engine
handles only initialization and completion observation. Direct method
calls between components, or path-walking inside the engine, defeat
queueing and contention semantics.

This ADR defines:

- how components communicate via typed port queues,
- how propagation delay is modeled (wire processes with BW occupancy),
- the fabric paths for Memory R/W (M_CPU bypass) and Kernel Launch
  (via M_CPU),
- the engine's reduced role (wire init + completion observation only),
- M_CPU.DMA as an internal subcomponent of M_CPU.

---

## Decision

### D1. Component port model

Each component has typed input/output ports modeled as SimPy Stores:

```text
in_ports:  dict[str, simpy.Store]   # keyed by source node_id
out_ports: dict[str, simpy.Store]   # keyed by destination node_id
```

Ports are created at engine initialization based on graph edges.
Each directed edge (src → dst) results in:

- `src.out_ports[dst]`  — the sending end
- `dst.in_ports[src]`   — the receiving end

---

### D2. Wire process (propagation delay + BW occupancy)

For each directed edge (src, dst) in the topology graph, a SimPy wire process
models propagation delay and BW occupancy:

```python
def wire_process(env, out_port, in_port, delay_ns, bw_gbs):
    available_at = 0.0
    while True:
        cmd = yield out_port.get()
        if bw_gbs > 0:
            nbytes = getattr(cmd, "nbytes", 0)
            if nbytes > 0:
                wait = available_at - env.now
                if wait > 0:
                    yield env.timeout(wait)
                available_at = env.now + (nbytes / bw_gbs)
        yield env.timeout(delay_ns)
        yield in_port.put(cmd)
```

Wire processes are started at engine initialization.
Each directed edge maintains an `available_at` timestamp tracking when the link
becomes free for the next transaction. When a transaction occupies a link, the
next transaction on the same directed link must wait until occupancy clears
(back-to-back serialization). TX and RX directions are independent (separate
wire processes with separate `available_at` state).

---

### D3. Engine role (reduced)

The simulation engine MUST:

- wire components at initialization (create port Stores, start wire processes),
- identify the entry component for each request type (PCIE_EP),
- put the request into the entry component's in_port,
- wait for a completion event.

The simulation engine MUST NOT:

- walk the topology path during request execution,
- call component `run()` methods directly,
- track per-hop latency or decompose fan-out.

---

### D4. Fabric paths for Memory R/W and Kernel Launch

Memory R/W and Kernel Launch use **different** fabric paths.
Memory operations bypass M_CPU and route directly to HBM via the crossbar.
Kernel Launch routes through M_CPU for PE fan-out.

**Memory R/W forward path (pcie_ep → hbm_ctrl, M_CPU bypass):**

```text
pcie_ep → io_noc → io_ucie
  → [transit cubes: ucie_in → noc → ucie_out]  (zero or more)
  → target cube: ucie_in → router mesh → hbm_ctrl
```

**Memory R/W completion path:**

```text
hbm_ctrl → router mesh → [transit cubes: ucie → router mesh → ucie]
  → io_ucie → io_noc → pcie_ep
```

**Kernel Launch forward path (pcie_ep → io_cpu → M_CPU → PE):**

```text
pcie_ep → io_noc → io_cpu → io_noc → io_ucie
  → [transit cubes: ucie_in → noc → ucie_out]  (zero or more)
  → target cube: ucie_in → noc → M_CPU → PE[0..n] (parallel fan-out)
```

**Kernel Launch completion path:**

```text
PE[0..n] all complete → M_CPU (aggregation)
  → noc → [transit cubes: ucie → noc → ucie]
  → io_ucie → io_noc → io_cpu → io_noc → pcie_ep
```

**Rationale for M_CPU bypass on Memory R/W:**

Memory write/read operations do not require command interpretation or PE
dispatch — they are direct data transfers to/from HBM. Routing through M_CPU
would add unnecessary overhead (5ns) without functional benefit. The io_noc
inside the IO chiplet handles the routing decision: memory operations go
directly to cube fabric, while kernel launches are forwarded to io_cpu first.

---

### D5. M_CPU.DMA is an internal subcomponent of M_CPU

M_CPU.DMA is NOT a separate topology node.
It is an internal subcomponent owned by the M_CPU component implementation.

M_CPU.DMA:

- owns the DMA READ and DMA WRITE queues (capacity=1 each, per ADR-0014 D4),
- issues memory requests over the NOC to hbm_ctrl,
- receives completion from hbm_ctrl via the NOC,
- reports completion to M_CPU,
- is created and managed inside M_CPU's `__init__` and `run()`.

M_CPU.DMA does not appear as a node in the compiled topology graph.

---

### D6. Transit cube forwarding

A cube that is not the target of a memory or kernel request acts as a transit node.
Transit cubes forward requests without consuming them:

```text
ucie_in (from upstream) → noc → ucie_out (to downstream)
```

Transit forwarding is implemented entirely within the ucie_in component.
The noc and ucie_out components in a transit cube forward the packet without modification.

---

### D7. _formula_latency is preserved as a lower-bound cross-check

The path-based formula latency function (`_formula_latency`) is preserved in the engine
as a lower bound for correctness verification.

Invariant:

- Phase 0: `_formula_latency == component model total_ns`
- Phase 1+: `_formula_latency <= component model total_ns` (contention adds queueing)

This function is independent of the port/wire model and requires only the topology graph.
It is used for shard comparison in `_route_kernel` and as a regression guard.

---

## Consequences

- Components model realistic hardware behavior (queues, contention, fan-out).
- Propagation delay is modeled accurately per edge.
- Engine is decoupled from routing policy.
- Component implementations remain swappable via DI (ADR-0007 D3).

---

## Links

- ADR-0007 D2 (engine role boundary)
- ADR-0009 D3 (kernel execution fan-out hierarchy)
- ADR-0014 D4 (DMA engine capacity=1)
- ADR-0012 D1 (host ↔ IO_CPU message schema; M_CPU.DMA is component-internal)
- ADR-0016 (IOChiplet NOC and memory data path)
- ADR-0017 (cube NOC 2D mesh architecture)
- ADR-0033 (Latency model assumptions built on these mechanisms)