Filename + lifecycle:
- ADR rename to ADR-NNNN-<cat>-title.md with 8 3-letter category prefixes
(dev / mem / lat / prog / algo / par / api / ver). Numbers stay immutable.
- ADR Lifecycle split into 3 folders, documented in CLAUDE.md Part 2:
docs/adr/ (Accepted), docs/adr-proposed/ (Proposed/Stub/Draft),
docs/adr-history/ (Superseded/Merged). Status field gains "Draft" for
retroactive docs pending verification.
Merges (one ADR per topic, no change-history annotations):
- ADR-0017 absorbs ADR-0019 (Cube NOC + per-PE HBM connectivity, 10 D-items)
- ADR-0014 absorbs ADR-0021 (PE pipeline execution model, 8 D-items incl.
TileToken self-routing and multi-op composite epilogue scope)
- ADR-0023 absorbs docs/ipcq-dma-codesign-hw.md as new "HW Realization
Notes (Informative)" section (D16-D23 + Open HW Questions). codesign-hw.md
deleted; ADR-0019/0021 moved to adr-history with one-line stub status
Retroactive documentation (G4 closures, code-verified):
- ADR-0037 forwarding component (TransitComponent: first-flit overhead,
serial worker, path-based routing, single impl/multiple names)
- ADR-0036 IO_CPU component (target_start_ns global barrier stamping,
per-cube fan-out, response aggregation)
- ADR-0035 M_CPU & M_CPU.DMA component (3 fan-out paths, DMA Resources,
target_start_ns passthrough)
- ADR-0034 HBM controller internal design (per-PC state, address-based
selection, flit-aware per-flit commit, async finalize, command-only
fallback path)
Content updates:
- ADR-0010 expanded to full CLI surface (run/probe/web), retitled
"Command Line Interface and Execution Semantics"
- ADR-0007 D2 rewritten to current state; ADR-0015 supersession notes pruned
- ADR-0005 wrapped in Decision header with D1-D5; ADR-0022 metadata
block replaced with standard Status header
- ADR-0024 trimmed to rank=SIP launcher essentials (D1-D4);
ADR-0027 cleaned of supersession history
- ADR-0033 D6 cleanup: address-based PC selection moved out of future-work
(now documented in ADR-0034 D3); related D1/D3 wording realigned
- Cross-references back-filled in 5 ADRs (G3 gaps closed)
Onboarding docs split:
- docs/onboarding/ created
- moved: hw-architecture-overview.md, latency-model.md, di-presentation.md,
ccl-author-guide{,.en}.md
- references updated in README, ADR-0023{,.en}, src/kernbench/ccl/__init__.py
Source / test / yaml: ADR-NNNN cross-references in docstrings and YAML
comments updated after the merges (ADR-0021->0014 D6, ADR-0019->0017 D8).
No behavior change.
Tooling:
- tools/verify_adr_lang_pairs.py + tests/test_verify_adr_lang_pairs.py
(ADR EN/KO pair invariant checker)
- .claude/commands/report.md tracked (/report slash command)
- .gitignore: allow .claude/commands/*.md while keeping settings files ignored
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
11 KiB
ADR-0017: Cube NOC and HBM Connectivity
Status
Accepted
Context
The CUBE-level NOC is a 2D router mesh that carries every intra-cube request: PE-to-HBM data, PE-to-PE traffic, command paths (M_CPU↔PE_CPU), shared SRAM access, and inter-cube UCIe traffic.
The CUBE's HBM is exposed through per-PE controller endpoints attached to PE routers. This per-PE partitioning makes local-vs-remote HBM distinguishable by mesh distance: a PE's own HBM partition sits at its own router (switching overhead only); another PE's HBM partition is reachable by mesh hops to that PE's router.
Two channel-mapping modes are supported in the design space:
- n:1 (default, implemented) — each PE's HBM partition aggregates
channels_per_pepseudo-channels into one endpoint. Effective per-PE BW = N × per-channel BW. - 1:1 (future) — each PE router decomposes into per-channel mini-routers; per-channel BW contention is modeled directly.
In both modes the per-PE effective BW is identical; only the connectivity granularity differs.
Decision
D1. 2D router mesh
Each cube contains a 2D mesh of NOC routers generated by mesh_gen.py.
- Node naming:
sip{S}.cube{C}.r{row}c{col}(e.g.,sip0.cube0.r0c0). - Implementation:
forwarding_v1. NOCoverhead_ns = 0. - Default 6×6 grid (sized from PE corner placement + UCIe attachment count); larger PE counts scale the grid up.
- HBM exclusion zone: center rows/columns are excluded where HBM die physically occupies space (e.g., r2c2, r2c3, r3c2, r3c3 for a 6×6).
- Latency = Manhattan distance ×
ns_per_mm.
D2. XY routing algorithm
Deterministic XY routing:
- Horizontal segment: route from source X to destination X at source Y.
- Vertical segment: route from destination X at source Y to destination Y.
Each directed segment carries a unique key:
- Horizontal:
("H", y_band, x_min, x_max, direction) - Vertical:
("V", x_band, y_min, y_max, direction)
Grid positions are snapped to the router grid, excluding the HBM zone.
D3. Per-segment contention model
Each directed XY segment is a simpy.Resource(capacity=1). Transactions
sharing a segment (same row or column band, same direction) contend for
the resource — modelling link-level serialization in a wormhole-routed
mesh.
With no contention, NOC traversal latency equals Manhattan distance ×
ns_per_mm. Under contention, SimPy's resource scheduling adds queueing
delay.
D4. NOC attachment points (per-PE HBM partition)
Every PE router carries three attachments: pe{idx}.dma, pe{idx}.cpu,
and pe{idx}.hbm. The last is the per-PE HBM controller endpoint —
sip{S}.cube{C}.hbm_ctrl.pe{idx} — which owns one slice of the cube's
HBM (one pseudo-channel group; see D8).
Other attachments:
- M_CPU and shared SRAM each occupy a dedicated edge router.
- UCIe endpoints (N/S/E/W) each expose 4 connection routers distributed along that edge (see D6).
UCIe-N (conn x4)
|
+---------+---+---+---------+
| | | |
PE0.dma ---+ r0c0 | ... | r0c5 +--- PE2.dma
PE0.cpu <--+ +hbm.pe0| | +hbm.pe2+--< PE2.cpu
| | | |
UCIe-W ----+ ... | [HBM] | ... +---- UCIe-E
(conn x4) | | zone | | (conn x4)
| r2c0 | | |
M_CPU <--->+ | | |
| r3c0 | | |
SRAM <---->+ | | |
| | | |
PE4.dma ---+ r4c0 | ... | r4c5 +--- PE6.dma
PE4.cpu <--+ +hbm.pe4| | +hbm.pe6+--< PE6.cpu
| | | |
+---------+---+---+---------+
|
UCIe-S (conn x4)
Per-PE HBM partitioning is the key invariant that makes local vs cross-PE HBM distinguishable by mesh distance (see D7).
D5. NOC edge bandwidths and distances
| Connection | BW (GB/s) | Distance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE_DMA → NOC | 256.0 | Physical (PE) | Matches local-HBM aggregate BW |
| NOC → PE_CPU | — | 0.0 mm | Command path only |
| Router ↔ hbm_ctrl.pe{idx} | 256.0 | 0.0 mm | Per PE router; N × per-channel BW (see D8) |
| NOC ↔ M_CPU | — | 0.0 mm | Command path |
| NOC ↔ SRAM | 128.0 × 4 | 0.0 mm | 512 GB/s aggregate |
| NOC ↔ UCIe conn | 128.0 | 0.0 mm | Per connection; 4 conn per port |
0.0 mm distances reflect the distributed nature of the NOC; actual
traversal distance is computed via Manhattan distance within the router
grid.
D6. UCIe decomposition and inter-cube traffic
Each of the 4 UCIe ports (N, S, E, W) decomposes into:
- 1
ucie-{PORT}node: UCIe protocol endpoint (overhead = 8.0 ns). - 4
ucie-{PORT}.conn{0-3}nodes: connection bridges between NOC and UCIe.
This decomposition gives 4 independent NOC↔UCIe connections per port, each with 128 GB/s bandwidth (512 GB/s aggregate per port).
Inter-cube traffic path:
Source: PE_DMA → NOC → conn{i} → ucie-{PORT}
[UCIe link: 512 GB/s, 1.0mm seam distance]
Target: ucie-{PORT} → conn{i} → r{x}c{y} → (mesh hops) → hbm_ctrl.pe{idx}
UCIe overhead (8.0 ns) is applied at each ucie-{PORT} node, so a full
crossing incurs 16 ns (TX port + RX port).
D7. Data paths through the NOC
All intra-cube traffic uses the same router mesh — no separate fast paths.
Local HBM (same PE's own partition; 0 mesh hops):
PE_DMA → r{x}c{y} → hbm_ctrl.pe{idx} (switching overhead only)
Cross-PE HBM within cube (target PE's partition, reached by mesh):
PE_DMA → r{x}c{y} → (mesh hops) → r{x'}c{y'} → hbm_ctrl.pe{idx'}
Example: PE0 (on r0c0) accessing PE2's HBM (PE2 on r1c4):
PE0.pe_dma → r0c0 → r0c1 → r0c2 → r0c3 → r0c4 → r1c4 → hbm_ctrl.pe2
Dijkstra computes the shortest path within the mesh.
Cross-cube HBM (UCIe traversal):
PE_DMA → r{x}c{y} → conn → ucie-{PORT} → [seam] → ucie-{PORT'} → conn
→ r{x'}c{y'} → hbm_ctrl.pe{idx'}
Kernel launch command to PE:
[from io_noc] → ucie → conn → r{x}c{y} → (mesh) → M_CPU → (mesh) → PE_CPU
Shared SRAM access:
PE_DMA → r{x}c{y} → (mesh) → SRAM
D8. HBM channel mapping mode
Channel mapping is configured at cube scope:
cube:
memory_map:
hbm_mapping_mode: n_to_one # one_to_one | n_to_one
hbm_pseudo_channels: 64 # total pseudo-channel count
hbm_channels_per_pe: 8 # per-PE local channel count
hbm_channel_bw_gbs: 32.0 # per-channel bandwidth (GB/s)
hbm_slices_per_cube: 8 # number of per-PE partitions
hbm_total_gb_per_cube: 48
n:1 mode (default, implemented). Each PE's HBM partition is a single
endpoint hbm_ctrl.pe{idx} that aggregates channels_per_pe pseudo-
channels. The Router ↔ hbm_ctrl.pe{idx} link bandwidth equals
channels_per_pe × hbm_channel_bw_gbs. Pseudo-channels are assumed to
interleave; only aggregate per-PE BW is modeled. No separate aggregated
router node exists — the per-PE router itself serves that role.
1:1 mode (future). Each PE router decomposes into N channel
mini-routers; per-channel routing carries fully-resolved PA + channel ID.
A ChannelSplitter resolves a logical access to N per-channel physical
requests. Per-channel link models BW contention. Cross-PE channel
access semantics are deferred to the implementation ADR.
BW math (defaults).
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| pseudo channels per cube | 64 (parameter) |
| PEs per cube | 8 (parameter) |
| channels per PE (N) | 64 / 8 = 8 |
| per-channel BW | 32 GB/s (parameter) |
| per-PE local BW | N × 32 = 256 GB/s |
| cube total HBM BW | 64 × 32 = 2048 GB/s |
Both modes give the same per-PE effective BW; only the request shape and contention model differ.
D9. AddressResolver — per-PE HBM endpoint
The address resolver decodes a PA's HBM offset to the owning PE's partition:
# policy/routing/router.py
hbm_slice_bytes = hbm_total_gb_per_cube * (1 << 30) // hbm_slices_per_cube
if addr.kind == "hbm":
pe_id = int(addr.hbm_offset) // hbm_slice_bytes
return f"sip{s}.cube{d}.hbm_ctrl.pe{pe_id}"
The pe_id computation is intrinsic to the routing layer (not a topology-time concern). Any HBM PA falls within exactly one partition, yielding deterministic routing.
External callers (e.g., M_CPU DMA, Memory R/W from PCIE_EP) follow the same resolver path — there is no separate fast path.
D10. Mesh generation parameters
mesh_gen.py produces cube_mesh.yaml from:
cube.pe_layout: corner placement (NW, NE, SW, SE) and PEs per corner.cube.geometry: cube physical dimensions and HBM zone.cube.ucie.n_connections: determines router count for UCIe attachment.
Output mesh_data dictionary contains:
- Router grid with positions and HBM exclusion zones.
- PE-to-router attachments (
pe{idx}.dma,pe{idx}.cpu,pe{idx}.hbmper PE). - UCIe-to-router attachments (N/S/E/W distributed across edge routers).
- M_CPU and SRAM router attachments.
Consequences
- Local HBM (0 mesh hops, switching overhead only) and cross-PE HBM (mesh hops) are naturally distinguishable, satisfying SPEC R5 (multi-domain communication) and ADR-0002 (no zero-latency end-to-end paths).
- All cube-internal traffic routes through one mesh — single contention model, single layout, single set of edge BWs.
- Per-PE HBM partitioning maps cleanly to the LA model (ADR-0011): each PE's partition is the n:1 aggregate of its assigned pseudo-channels.
- 1:1 mode extension is structurally natural — split each PE router into N channel routers.
- Mesh generation is fully parameterised by
topology.yaml; PE/cube geometry changes propagate without code edits.
Links
- ADR-0002 (Routing distance, ordering, no zero-latency paths)
- ADR-0003 D3 (cube-level NOC definition — extended here)
- ADR-0004 (Memory semantics, local HBM)
- ADR-0011 (Memory addressing — LA model consumes per-PE partition)
- ADR-0014 D1 (PE_DMA egress via router mesh)
- ADR-0015 D4 (fabric paths for Memory R/W and Kernel Launch)
- ADR-0016 (IOChiplet io_noc — analogous pattern at IO chiplet level)
- ADR-0033 (Latency model: per-PC parallelism, switch penalty)